-
Kamala Harris Paid Oprah 2.5 Million For Endorsement
Kamala Harris spent $1 Billion Dollars on her campaign in just 100 days. Not only did Kamala Harris spend one billion in just two months, but she is 20 million dollars in the hole. It turns out that Kamala Harris paid many celebrities for their endorsement: Beyonce was paid $10 milliion. Where is My Daddy Podcast was paid $100,000. Al Sharpton was paid $500,000, the list goes on. How can someone spend over one billion dollars and not win? How can Kamala Harris spend a billion dollars in two months and be negative 20 billion and consider herself fit to become President of the United States? Can Kamala Harris get in trouble for this? You can help out so many poor families with a billion dollars. Is this campaign fraud?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NRiRPe7mfw&ab_channel=KREM2News
-
3 Replies
-
In the last election, Vice President Kamala Harris’s 2024 presidential campaign is said to have made over $1 billion and claimed to have finished with more than $20 million in debt.
However, the exact details cannot be confirmed. Some of these costs were incurred in advertising, payroll, and event hosting. It is said that approximately $15 million was spent on star endorsements, $4 million on social media promotions, and $690 million on mass media campaigns.
Dollars paid to some of the stars are obscene. For a town hall event, a reported $2.5 million was given to Oprah Winfrey’s production house.
This begs the question, where is the proof that some nation paid $10 million to Beyonce or $100,000 to the podcast ‘Where is My Daddy?’
Seeing how money was spent, one could start questioning how the campaign was managed because clearly, the campaign does not equate money spent into wins; for example, yes, the almost $600 million in campaign debt is quite something. But no one is in jail or charged with violating campaign laws.
A word about campaign ethics: All the money spent could be redirected to many other things, but as the name suggests, funds are given purely for elections, which is where that money has to be used because the reality is that the same doesn’t don’t have hundreds migrating towards other areas.
To summarize, although the Harris campaign’s financial activities were criticized, none were illegal or involved a violation of campaign finance laws. Although the campaign’s budget was rather high, it was legal.
-
he financial activities of Vice President Kamala Harris’s 2024 presidential campaign have raised questions about campaign management and ethics, especially given the substantial amounts spent on endorsements and advertising. Here’s a summary of the key points:
Campaign Financial Overview
Total Raised: The campaign reportedly raised over $1 billion.
Debt: It finished with more than $20 million in debt, raising concerns about financial management.
Spending Breakdown:
Star Endorsements: Approximately $15 million.
Social Media Promotions: About $4 million.
Mass Media Campaigns: Around $690 million.
Notable Expenses
High-Profile Payments: Significant sums were paid for endorsements, including $2.5 million to Oprah Winfrey’s production house for a town hall event.
Controversial Claims: Reports of payments such as $10 million to Beyoncé or $100,000 to the podcast “Where is My Daddy?” have sparked skepticism about the campaign’s financial transparency.
Ethical Considerations
Use of Funds: The campaign’s spending practices have led to discussions about the ethics of using vast sums for political campaigns rather than other social needs.
Legal Compliance: Despite the campaign’s high expenditures and resulting debt, there have been no allegations of illegal activities or violations of campaign finance laws.While the Harris campaign’s financial practices have faced scrutiny, they remained within legal boundaries. The significant debt and high spending on endorsements raise questions about campaign effectiveness and priorities, but without any legal infractions, the financial activities are deemed permissible under current campaign finance regulations.
-
The issues you’ve brought up related to the campaign funding of Ms. Kamala Harris are alarming, especially the amount of money used and the lack of political success. Before this is discussed in detail, let us point out a few things in this context:
A look at the spending of the campaign
Total Expenditure: The report indicates that the campaign used something over $1 billion within a short period—no rational reasoning given the reports to the expenditure, which raises questions about management and efficacy.
Star support: Enormous amounts were purportedly disbursed to various celebrities for endorsement, including $ 10 million for Beyonce and $ 500,000 for Al Sharpton. Such expenditures may raise about how they contributed to attaining campaign goals.
Effectiveness Challenges
Expenditure and output: The amount of money these people are talking about and the fact that a campaign can spend it and end up with a negative bank balance and no votes again expands the scope of queries regarding the Executive’s decisionstive for the already spoken campaign.
General image of the Campaign: Spending large amounts of money and achieving nothing can lead to the impression that the Campaign’sCampaign’s furious efforts are focused on nothing but winning votes.
Legal and ethical issues
Campaign finance violations: While spending may be excessive, as long as the provisions of campaign finance law are complied with, such spending cannot be termed illegal or fraudulent. Campaigns are only restricted in how certain funds may be used legally.
Potential for Scrutiny: Any violations or discrepancies with the campaign finances could lead to investigations. However, as of now, there are no allegations of illegal activity.
Alternatives for Fund Utilization
Social Impact: The fact that such huge sums did not get used to assist families or programs within the community leads to a wider debate on the use of campaign funds vis a vis the perceived need in society.
On the one hand, Kamala Harris is responsible for the overwhelming spending and consequent debt she has incurred regarding her campaign’s management and monetary resources. However, unless specific breaches of campaign laws are established, this does not imply scheme fraud or illegality. The situation demands transparency and accountability regarding campaign financing while presenting the challenges of such financing in the political context.
In the last election, Vice President Kamala Harris’s 2024 presidential campaign is said to have made over $1 billion and claimed to have finished with more than $20 million in debt.
However, the exact details cannot be confirmed. These costs were incurred in advertising, payroll, and event hosting. It is said that approximately $15 million was spent on star endorsements, $4 million on social media promotions, and $690 million on mass media campaigns.
Dollars paid to some of the stars are obscene. For a town hall event, a reported $2.5 million was given to Oprah Winfrey’s production house.
This begs the question, where is the proof that some nation paid $10 million to Beyonce or $100,000 to the podcast ‘Where is My Daddy?’
Seeing how money was spent, one could start questioning how the campaign was managed because clearly, the campaign does not equate money spent into wins; for example, yes, the almost $600 million in campaign debt is quite something. But no one is in jail or charged with violating campaign laws.
A word about campaign ethics: All the money spent could be redirected to many other things, but as the name suggests, funds are given purely for elections, which is where that money has to be used because the reality is that the same doesn’t don’t have hundreds migrating towards other areas.
To summarize, although the Harris campaign’s financial activities were criticized, none were illegal or involved a violation of campaign finance laws. Although the campaign’s budget was rather high, it was legal.
-