-
Former President Donald Trump Guilty on All Counts
The verdict is in on former President Donald Trump’s trial in New York. Former President Donald Trump has been found guilty on all 34 charges in his hush money case. Never before in history has a former president of the United States been tried after they left office of the Presidency. This trial of former President Donald Trump was politically motivated with many things wrong with even going to trial. No doubt the trial was politically motivated due to the fear and panic of former President Donald Trump running for office of the Presidency of the United States in November 2024. The charges against President Donald Trump are related to falsifying business records to conceal a $130,000 payment made to adult film star Stormy Daniels. This payment was part of an effort to prevent Daniels from going public with her claims about a 2006 encounter with Trump. This historic conviction marks Trump as the first former U.S. president to be convicted of felony crimes. The jury deliberated for 9.5 hours before reaching their verdict, which involved examining numerous invoices, vouchers, and checks connected to the reimbursement payments made to Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, who initially covered the payment to Daniels. The sentencing for Trump is scheduled for July 11, just before the Republican National Convention where he is expected to be nominated as the 2024 presidential candidate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NM1v-Tyvvso&list=RDNSNM1v-Tyvvso&start_radio=1
-
10 Replies
-
The Democrats have made a grave mistake. It is a no-brainer that the arrest, charges, and trial of former President Donald Trump is going to backfire on Joe Biden, and the Democrats. New York made a grave mistake and set them backwards on the map. The potential political fallout from a guilty verdict for Donald Trump in any of his ongoing legal cases is complex and multifaceted. While some argue that it could backfire on Democrats, the evidence suggests a more nuanced outcome.
Impact on Independents: A conviction is likely to harm Trump’s chances with independent voters. More than a third of independents have indicated that a guilty verdict would make them less likely to support Trump in the 2024 election. In a closely contested race, this could be significant and detrimental to his campaign.
Partisan Reactions: The response to a potential guilty verdict is highly polarized. Most Democrats view Trump as guilty across his various legal issues, while a vast majority of Republicans do not believe in his guilt. This partisan split suggests that a conviction might reinforce existing opinions rather than change minds significantly.
Short-term vs. Long-term Effects: While a guilty verdict might initially hurt Trump politically, especially among undecided voters, its long-term impact is less certain. The political landscape can shift dramatically over time, and other issues may overshadow the verdict as the election approaches.
Republican Base Mobilization: On the flip side, a guilty verdict could energize Trump’s base, framing the trials as politically motivated attacks. This could increase voter turnout among his core supporters, potentially countering some of the negative effects among independents.
Legal and Credibility Challenges: The prosecution’s reliance on testimonies from figures like Michael Cohen, who has credibility issues, could influence the case’s outcome and public perception. If the defense successfully undermines these witnesses, it could lead to doubts about the fairness of the trial.
In summary, while a guilty verdict for Trump might backfire by energizing his base, it is also likely to alienate key independent voters, which could be crucial in a tight election. The overall impact will depend on various factors, including the broader political context and how both parties respond to the verdict.
-
This reply was modified 5 months, 1 week ago by Kay Anne.
-
This idiot Juan Merchan should be locked up and sentenced to life in prison. Juan Merchan is a judge in the New York State court system. Some key details about him. Juan Merchan is a judge for the Criminal Court of the Supreme Court of the State of New York in Manhattan. Until he went wacko on former President Donald Trump, Juan Merchan was respected by parties of both sides. In May 2022, he was assigned to preside over the criminal case against former President Donald Trump’s family business, the Trump Organization. The Trump Organization was accused of helping top executives avoid income taxes on bonuses, luxury perks and other compensation. In December 2022, Judge Merchan sentenced the Trump Organization to pay a $1.6 million criminal penalty after it was convicted of tax fraud and other charges. Juan Merchan has also presided over other high-profile cases in New York, including the criminal case against former movie producer Harvey Weinstein in 2020. Merchan has served as a judge in New York since 2009 when he was initially appointed to the Criminal Court bench. Prior to becoming a judge, he worked as a prosecutor in the office of the New York County District Attorney for over a decade. Juan Merchan is an experienced New York judge who has overseen several major white-collar and celebrity criminal trials in recent years, most notably the Trump Organization tax fraud case in 2022. However, many experts believe Juan Merchan hung his own throat. Judge Juan Merchan went for the jugular against former President Donald Trump. More to come on this story and this is not the last for Juan Merchan and Alvin Bragg which many see their careers in turmoil and many reports of death threats.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VSODPEwK5M&ab_channel=ForbesBreakingNews
-
This reply was modified 5 months, 1 week ago by
-
Trial of former President Donald Trump should have never happened. There is going to be a lot of repercussions against New York. It can and will most likely bankruptcy New York, ruin many careers including New York District Attorney Alan Braggs, the judge, and for sure the democrats. The judge overseeing the New York civil fraud trial against former President Donald Trump is Judge Arthur Engoron. This trial involves allegations that Trump and his organization fraudulently inflated the value of their assets. In addition to the New York case, Trump faces multiple legal challenges, each with different judges presiding over them, including federal cases related to election subversion and classified documents. The prosecutors in the various legal cases involving former President Donald Trump include multiple individuals across different jurisdictions. In the New York civil fraud case, the key figure is New York Attorney General Letitia James. For federal cases, such as those involving alleged election interference and classified documents, Special Counsel Jack Smith is leading the prosecution. Additionally, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is handling the case related to election interference in Georgia. Each of these prosecutors plays a significant role in the respective cases against Trump. The outcomes of these trials could significantly impact Trump’s political future and public opinion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttOQlM9gLIY&ab_channel=WPLGLocal10
-
New York is going to be sorry for charging President Donald Trump. I think that former President Donald Trump will come out ahead with him being charged, tried, and convicted of 36 felony charges. Even Democrats do not think it was the right thing to do to charge a former President and take the word of a lying porn star Stormy Daniels, a crooked lawyer Michael Cohen, and far left liberal prosecutors, judge, and jury. Charging former President Trump could lead to several potential regrets for New York, including:
Political Backlash: The case might galvanize Trump’s supporters, increasing political polarization and potentially backfiring on the prosecuting authorities.
Resource Allocation: The significant time, money, and resources required for such a high-profile case could be viewed as a misallocation, especially if the outcome is uncertain.
Public Perception: If seen as politically motivated, the prosecution could harm the credibility of the New York judicial system and its perceived impartiality.
Each of these factors could influence New York’s political and social landscape. The decision to try former President Donald Trump involves complex legal, ethical, and political considerations. Here are some key points:
- Rule of Law: Proponents argue that holding Trump accountable upholds the principle that no one is above the law, reinforcing the integrity of the legal system.
- Deterrence: It may deter future leaders from engaging in similar conduct.
- Political Risks: Critics warn of increased political polarization and potential backlash from Trump’s supporters, which could impact social cohesion and trust in institutions.
Ultimately, whether it was the “right” thing to do depends on one’s perspective on these factors.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4wswU2ymfs
-
This reply was modified 5 months, 1 week ago by Hector.
-
The jurors for former President Trump’s trial were selected from a pool of New York City residents. The selection process aimed to ensure a fair and impartial jury by screening potential jurors for biases and conflicts of interest. Jurors typically undergo a thorough vetting process, which includes answering questions about their backgrounds, beliefs, and potential prejudices related to the case. This process aims to select individuals who can objectively evaluate the evidence presented during the trial. Judge Arthur Engoron is the presiding judge over former President Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial in New York. He has a background in law and extensive experience within the New York judicial system. Engoron earned his law degree from New York University School of Law and has served as a judge in the New York Supreme Court. He has presided over numerous high-profile cases and is known for his meticulous approach to legal proceedings. His decisions in the Trump case have been closely watched and widely reported.
-
This is so not right. Donald Trump is a former President of the United States. What is wrong with New York? What is wrong with people. Seems like the prosecutor. This moron Alvin Bragg needs to be locked up immediately and tried for just being evil. Alvin Bragg is the Manhattan District Attorney, not Alan Braggs. Alvin Bragg made headlines for prosecuting high-profile cases, including those involving former President Donald Trump. He assumed office in January 2022 and has focused on issues like criminal justice reform and addressing violent crime. Before becoming DA, Bragg worked as a federal prosecutor and as Chief Deputy Attorney General in New York, where he handled cases related to corruption, fraud, and civil rights. The judge presiding over some of the high-profile cases involving former President Donald Trump is Judge Juan Merchan. Judge Merchan is a New York State Supreme Court Justice known for handling complex and significant cases. He has a reputation for being fair and thorough in his judicial proceedings. Judge Merchan has been involved in various notable cases and has a background in law enforcement and legal practice in New York. Mark my words. Joe Biden, and the liberal left will regret this with Donald Trump. Biden, Obama, Pelosi, Schumer, Gavin Newsom, Kamala Harris, and a boatload of Democrats are gonna get charged, tried, convicted, and sentenced to long prison terms. They will regret this.
-
This idiot Juan Merchan should be locked up and sentenced to life in prison. Juan Merchan is a judge in the New York State court system. Some key details about him. Judge Juan Merchan and New York Attorney General Alvin Bragg are the two most hated people in the world. Even Democrats are against these two clowns. Juan Merchan is a judge for the Criminal Court of the Supreme Court of the State of New York in Manhattan. In May 2022, he was assigned to preside over the criminal case against former President Donald Trump’s family business, the Trump Organization. The Trump Organization was accused of helping top executives avoid income taxes on bonuses, luxury perks and other compensation. In December 2022, Judge Merchan sentenced the Trump Organization to pay a $1.6 million criminal penalty after it was convicted of tax fraud and other charges.
Judge Juan Merchan
Background: Judge Juan Merchan is a New York State Supreme Court Justice known for handling significant and complex cases. He has a reputation for being fair and meticulous in his judicial proceedings.
Notable Cases: Merchan has presided over various high-profile cases, including those involving former President Donald Trump.
District Attorney Alvin Bragg
Background: Alvin Bragg is the Manhattan District Attorney, having assumed office in January 2022. He has a background in law and has worked as a federal prosecutor and as Chief Deputy Attorney General in New York.
Focus: Bragg focuses on issues such as criminal justice reform and addressing violent crime. He has been involved in prosecuting high-profile cases, including those against former President Donald Trump.
These two legal figures play significant roles in the judicial system of New York, particularly in high-stakes cases involving prominent individuals.
Juan Merchan has also presided over other high-profile cases in New York, including the criminal case against former movie producer Harvey Weinstein in 2020. Merchan has served as a judge in New York since 2009 when he was initially appointed to the Criminal Court bench. Prior to becoming a judge, he worked as a prosecutor in the office of the New York County District Attorney for over a decade.
Juan Merchan is an experienced New York judge who has overseen several major white-collar and celebrity criminal trials in recent years, most notably the Trump Organization tax fraud case in 2022.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzGED-4-3Qs
-
This reply was modified 5 months, 1 week ago by
Gustan.
-
This reply was modified 5 months, 1 week ago by
-
So, are Democrats happy President Donald Trump is convicted of 34 counts and is facing long prison time?
-
Crooked Joe Biden is so happy former Donald Trump got convicted on 34 counts. Joe Biden could not help but say that “Nobody’s Above The Law.” WOW. How can he say that with a straight face. Former President Donald Trump faces 187 years in prison on the 34 felony convictions. The indictment of former President Donald Trump involves a complex interplay of legal, political, and procedural factors. Here are key points to understand:
Role of the Biden Administration and Democrats
- Independence of the Judiciary: In the United States, the judiciary operates independently from the executive branch. Indictments and prosecutions are carried out by the judicial system, not directly by the President or Congress.
- Federal and State Cases: Trump’s legal challenges involve both federal and state cases. State cases, such as the one in New York led by District Attorney Alvin Bragg, are initiated at the state level and are not directly influenced by the federal government.
- Department of Justice (DOJ): Federal cases, such as those involving alleged mishandling of classified documents or election interference, fall under the purview of the Department of Justice. While the DOJ is part of the executive branch, it is expected to operate independently from political influence. Special Counsel Jack Smith, appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland, is overseeing these federal investigations to ensure impartiality.
- Political Context: While some Republicans and Trump supporters may view the indictments as politically motivated, arguing that Democrats are using the legal system to target Trump, others emphasize the importance of accountability and the rule of law. Democrats and other critics of Trump argue that legal proceedings are based on credible allegations and evidence of wrongdoing.
Public Perception
- Polarization: The indictments have further polarized public opinion. Trump’s supporters often see these actions as a continuation of what they perceive as unfair treatment and political persecution, while his critics believe that no one is above the law and that Trump should be held accountable for any alleged crimes.
- Impact on Elections: The legal challenges could have significant implications for Trump’s political future and the broader political landscape, including potential impacts on upcoming elections.
While the Biden administration and Democrats are not directly responsible for the indictments, the political context and public perceptions are heavily influenced by the ongoing partisan divide. The legal processes are conducted by independent judicial and prosecutorial bodies, both at the state and federal levels, with the goal of upholding the law.
-
Here’s the REAL DONALD TRUMP