-
GCA Forums News for Wednesday May 28 2025
Welcome to GCA Forums for an update dated May 28, 2025, covering the latest topics in real estate, mortgage lending, the economy, and other pertinent news for our community of professionals and consumers. Today, we’d like to shed light on a federal inquiry into New York AG Letitia James for suspected mortgage fraud, the Dow Jones record increase, frozen housing markets, and changes in immigration policies regarding sanctuary cities and states. We would like to understand the implications of these issues, especially for real estate and lending professionals, regarding mortgage fraud, economic policies, and regulatory frameworks.
James has recently been accused of mortgage fraud, which has caught the attention of the New York Attorney General, Letitia James.
US Attorney General and the FBI Undertake Criminal Referral of New York Attorney General Letitia James
The US Department of Justice and the FBI are undertaking the inquiry. It all began with a Tip-off from FHFA director William Pulte on 04-14-2025. In his letter to the Department of Justice, he claimed that James was committing multiple counts of bank fraud and submitting property documents as collateral for obtaining favorable mortgage terms for some properties she owned in New York and Virginia. His accusations included a 2023 real estate deal in Norfolk, Virginia. James purportedly claimed a primary residence for lower mortgage pricing while legally obliged to be a New York resident for her position. He also claimed that James misrepresented a Brooklyn brownstone as a four-unit property instead of five to claim better loan terms, which she has been doing since 2001. To top it all off, Pulte also presented a mortgage document from 1983 that both James and her father signed as husband and wife, purportedly to underwrite the loan.
Following news reports and research by forensic accountant Sammy Antar, these claims have caused a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia to issue subpoenas, indicating a significant development.
NY Attorney General James Refutes Allegations of Mortgage Fraud
James has vigorously refuted the allegations, labeling them as unfounded and a product of political animus. Lowell, who defended James’s claim, further argued on April 24, 2025, that the charges constituted a retaliatory counterstrike in the context of James’s $454 million civil fraud case with ex-President Donald Trump. For the Virginia property, Lowell explained that James was helping her niece, Shamice Thompson-Hairston, with a down payment. She had told the mortgage broker in writing, notably in bold CAPS, that the naval house was not her primary residence. Lowell provided additional documents for the Brooklyn property, including an accurate unit count for other filings, claiming Pulte used outdated records to misrepresent litigation. He disregarded the 1983 mortgage husband-and-wife claim as a clerical error, pointing out the deed stated James was her father’s daughter. The Attorney General’s office in New York has not publicly disclosed co-counselors other than Lowell. James intends to allocate state money for her legal representation, a decision funded by taxpayers that some have deemed as overreach, although authorized by legislators. The mortgage broker for the Virginia transaction remains anonymous, with no company mentioned and no statements made.
FBI Director Kash Patel Speaks on Mortgage Fraud Issue
In an interview with Fox News on May 19, 2025, FBI Director Kash Patel spoke on the issue, highlighting its significance and confirming it is in the hands of professionals, giving him and his Deputy Director, Dan Bongino, direct reports. He would not give more details because of the ongoing investigation. Pam Bondi, the US Attorney General, did not comment directly but was called out in her Senate confirmation for saying that ‘politics won’t dictate DOJ actions,’ which raised questions of why she would be scrutinized over such a promise. Lowell brought up this promise, claiming that the investigation is an effort driven by politics attempting to target officials who support Trump. X posts show divided opinions, some stating that fraud has been confirmed. In contrast, others call it a witch hunt as public opinion gaps deepen.
Mortgage Fraud Hurts People Who Play by the Rules
As for the GCA Forums Mortgage Group, this case highlights the industry’s enduring mortgage fraud problem. Whether these allegations against James are true or politically influenced does not matter, but they highlight that mortgage lending must be transparent and compliant at all levels. Practices like these, where the details of a property or ownership are misrepresented, destroy the community’s trust and fairness, which is why we are determined to end these practices.
Trump Abolishing Income Tax and IRS
In recent policy conversations, the removal of income tax has been considered. As of May 28, 2025, there is no definitive plan to eliminate federal income tax. Some policymakers have suggested replacing income tax with other revenue generators, such as tariffs or consumption taxes. However, no bills have been passed. Such a change would be politically difficult and skeptical because overhauling the federal revenue system would be incredibly complicated. Likewise, claims that property tax is illegal or amounts to $450 billion worth of fraud lack justification. Local governments impose property taxes as a staple revenue-generating mechanism to fund public services like education and infrastructure, directly supporting civic functions. Wide-reaching claims of systemic fraud often originate from fringe conjectures, ungrounded by solid facts or legal rationales.
Today’s Economy
Since the current administration took charge, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has been soaring due to the expected business-friendly policies, such as deregulation and tax incentives. Investors are especially optimistic because of anticipated corporate tax cuts and leaner regulatory burdens, especially in the energy and finance industries. Other markets have varied reactions: the S&P 500 is up moderately, but NASDAQ and other tech-heavy indices have been more volatile due to concerns over increasing interest rates. Internationally, Europe and Asia are more guarded with their stock markets due to uncertainty about American trade policy and how tariffs will affect them.
Housing and Mortgage News
The housing market is still at a standstill because activity is limited due to high mortgage rates and low inventory. As noted by Freddie Mac, the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate is 7.2 percent as of May 28, 2025. This is slightly down from peak levels, but pre-2023 levels are still far above this. The 15-year fixed rate hovers around 6.5%. These rates show that stubborn inflation continues to put pressure, along with the Federal Reserve being very careful regarding rate cuts. There are no signs of rate cuts from President Trump or the Fed, as claims to bolster housing demand are put on the back burner while inflation is at the forefront. The elevated rates and high home prices mean buyers have lower purchasing power, further slowing sales. Due to high material costs, newly constructed buildings are lagging. The limited lab supply tightens the supply even more.
ICE and Deportations of Illegal Migrants
San Diego is one of California’s largest cities and hosts a large immigrant population. In this case, the state bureaucracy indeed understands how ICE operates. It does whatever is in its power to mitigate losses, at least in the formal sense. However, sanctuary states sustain direct attacks from ICE and do face serious repercussions in terms of being targeted by the Trump administration, as federal aid is likely to be suspended during this period.
Poland Asks for Help
Poland asks for financial support from the eurozone while repeatedly failing to adhere to the criteria set by the EU. Seeking funds while carrying the additional burden of upholding immigration laws seems ludicrous. On the other hand, immigration policies that lack a clear pretext for hiring foreigners based on EU citizenship, granted that the framework exists. As for regions around the border ice, they can deploy extra agents and capture everyone else carrying border crossing passes; however, questions about why the EU allows free movement raise eyebrows. Sadly, no one cares beyond operational efficiency.
Housing Market and Stagnant Mortgage Rates
Several indicators are responsible for the default in the housing market and stagnant mortgage rates. Like other rates, lenders and mortgage companies set mortgage rates. Point blank, higher rates lead to lower profits, resulting in losses. The Trump Administration has focused more on long-term energy independence deregulation, which is suspected of easing inflation over time, and struggles with short-term relief concerns. Real estate and construction have also been stricken due to the zoning burden, high demand, and lower housing supply. In contrast to reduced profits, which would ease demand and stagnant pricing, prices remain propped up.
One can speculate on the bounds and bounds of reasoning regarding the stance on the world’s mortgage and real estate policies. Paying thoughts slim and slim towards an economy that seems to grow without bounds pushes us towards idealistic reasoning – one simple disparate change to ease legislation. Keeping up to date with the salient topics presented to us belittles us, so we drop other burdens of reality, staying with hopes that few and few wish to see.
-
8 Replies
-
Letitia James, the New York Attorney General, is facing 30 years in federal prison if convicted. Letitia James is on a state of denial and is calling her charges baseless accusations.
https://www.youtube.com/live/Ha5F4NENJ6I?si=DD7TC9fbGpldGxhb
-
After Federal Housing Finance Agency Director William Pulte’s referral in April 2025, New York Attorney General Letitia James is now facing a federal criminal investigation for purported mortgage fraud. CNN and The Washington Post, among others, have confirmed the inquiry. It focuses on the allegation that James fraudulently claimed a property in Norfolk, Virginia, as her primary residence to qualify for lower mortgage rates, along with other real estate claims concerning Brooklyn and Virginia. If found guilty of wire or bank fraud, she would be sentenced to up to 30 years in prison due to the severe consequences these charges incur when financial institutions are involved.
James and her lawyer, Abbe Lowell, dismissed the allegations as “long-discredited” and “baseless.” They claim the investigation is politically motivated because of her legal actions against President Trump, which included suing him for fraud in 2022 and winning a $454 million judgment in 2024. Lowell has maintained that the documents supporting the claims result from misrepresentation, such as in 2023 power of attorney documents, where Virginia was erroneously marked as James’ primary residence, but was later updated to reflect her non-residency. James has referred to the investigation as part of Trump’s “revenge tour.” He has asserted her innocence while refusing to litigate the case in the press. According to CBS News and The Guardian, new developments have implied the investigation has intensified since a federal grand jury in Virginia has begun issuing subpoenas to consider evidence. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s office has prioritized the cases involving “politicized justice,” which has been deemed a politically motivated conflict by some who criticize the administration and defenders of justice officials like James, who have put their careers on the line to challenge Trump. The investigation is still active; no charges have been filed since May 28, 2025. James has retained Abbe Lowell, a celebrity attorney, as her counsel. Lawmakers in New York also provide additional funding to pay for the legal fees of state officials, which received backlash from some lawmakers like Rep. Elise Stefanik, who described it as a slush fund.
The investigation and the active allegations are very polarizing. Supporters such as NYC council speaker Adrienne Adams say that James is a victim of a political attack for doing her job and goes after Trump unapologetically. Trump-backed critics argue that the severity of the accusations warrants the investigation. It is too early to tell what will happen, as there have not been any formal charges or a trial. Still, given the circumstances, the stakes are incredibly high, especially for the penalties and James’ position.
-
-
Who was the mortgage broker in the New York Attorney General Letitia James’ mortgage fraud case for her Virginia and New York mortgage fraud cases? It should be public record that everyone involved with the mortgage fraud case of Letitia James in Virginia and New York. The mortgage company, the mortgage loan originator, the NMLS number of the mortgage company, the NMLS number of the Mortgage Loan Originator, and others involved.
-
Based on my provided sources, I will explain each point you requested and summarize the publicly available information. As such, the records do not mention the mortgage loan originator or mortgage company with their relevant NMLS numbers concerning the alleged fraud with Attorney General Letitia James’ properties in Virginia and New York.
Background on the Allegations
A Trump-appointed attorney recently sent a letter to the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) alleging that Letitia James, the attorney general of New York, committed mortgage fraud with two properties: a house in Norfolk, Virginia, purchased in 2023, and a New York brownstone she owned since 2001. William J. Pulte, FHFA Director, sent a letter to U.S. Attorney Bondi outlining these concerns, including the alleged actions of Attorney James. The details of the fraud are as follows:
Virginia Property:
James is accused of inflating her primary residency status on a mortgage application for a house in Norfolk, Virginia, in 2023, purportedly offering a better interest rate. While allegedly required to maintain her residence in New York as a statewide elected official, she co-signed the mortgage with her niece, who was slated to live there.
Brooklyn Property:
James is accused of misrepresenting a brownstone with five units as having only four in her loan applications, potentially to qualify for loans with better terms and caps for properties with four or fewer units.
Claims from the Past
She signed a mortgage in 1983 and again in 2000 with her father, assuming the roles of husband and wife to obtain the loan.
The situation with the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office based in Albany, New York, is still active, as a grand jury from the Eastern District of Virginia is working on subpoenas for the Norfolk property—James’ legal counsel. Abbe Lowell has stated that the claims made are politically charged and disputes the claims as ” baseless,” claiming that any errors made were simply small documentation errors conveyed where the Virginia property was not her primary residence.
Questions Asked and The Answers Found
Mortgage Broker
Finding:
Documents obtained do not name the mortgage broker connected to the transactions of the Virginia or New York properties. A ” mortgage loan broker” is mentioned in the Virginia property. James allegedly stated in an email in capital letters, “This property WILL NOT be my primary residence,” which implies that he is interested in a specific mortgage. However, no further information is given about the broker’s name, identifying details, or other relevant details.
Public Record Status:
Brokers are considered public records and, as such, are found in loan applications and closing documents. The county or city clerk typically receives these documents. It is reasonable that records would exist for the Virginia property located in Norfolk, Virginia, and for the Brooklyn property in Kings County, New York.
Though the sources mentioned do not specifically publicly cite mortgage deeds or loan applications, retrieving them would mean contacting the respective county clerk or recorder’s offices directly.
Mortgage Company:
Finding:
One of the sources for the Virginia property lists the lender as **American Neighborhood Mortgage Acceptance Company, LLC (better known as Annie Mac). For the Brooklyn property transactions, no specific mortgage company is named. Still, it is stated that the loans were conforming loans through Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Form 3033, meaning some lenders approved by these government-sponsored enterprises were involved.
Public Record Status:
Annie Mac is only partially confirmed as the mortgage company for the Virginia property, and no other relevant information, such as the branch or loan officer, is mentioned. Not having a named lender for the Brooklyn property implies that the information either does not exist publicly or has not yet been disclosed in the news. While the mortgage records are known to be publicly available in the property records, these documents have not been detailed fully in the sources.
Mortgage Loan Originator:
Finding:
The available sources do not name an individual mortgage loan originator for either property. Handling the loan application is within the scope of the mortgage loan originator’s (MLO) duties. Loan documents typically capture their names and NMLS numbers. This information is lacking because the specific mortgage documents are not available.
Public Record Status.
Information about MLOs is contained in the records of loan origination, which, of course, are not disclosed in the press. Nevertheless, they are part of mortgage documents submitted to the appropriate agencies. These records can be obtained through public requests in Norfolk, Virginia, or Kings County, New York. Still, they are not found in the materials offered.
NMLS Number of the Mortgage Company
Finding:
American Neighborhood Mortgage Acceptance Company, LLC (Annie Mac) holds an NMLS number 338923. This information can be accessed through public NMLS records and verified via the NMLS Consumer Access portal (www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org). No mortgage company is specified for the Brooklyn property; therefore, no NMLS number is linked to that transaction.
Public Record Status:
Accessing Annie Mac’s NMLS number requires accessing the NMLS database with the required information. The lender, Bridgeline, requires marking an NMLS number associated with the Brooklyn property, which is not in the available documents.
NMLS Number of Mortgage Loan Originator:
Applying the previously established rules, submitting a finding is unnecessary because neither property was served by a specific mortgage loan originator, resulting in the absence of an NMLS number for MLO. Every registered MLO is assigned an individual NMLS number, which, in this case, cannot be retrieved without a named individual.
Public Record Status:
The MLO NMLS numbers are part of the documents filed with NMLS and can be confirmed on the NMLS Consumer Access website. However, determination is impossible because the name is absent from the provided documents.
Others Involved:
Finding:
The main people and organizations described in the claims are as follows:
- Letitia James: The New York Attorney General and co-borrower on the Virginia property mortgage.
- Shamice Thompson-Hairston: James’ niece, a co-borrower on the Virginia property.
- She intended to make the property her primary residence.
- Abbe Lowell: James’s defense attorney is responding to his allegations.
- William J. Pulte: FHFA Director who issued the criminal referral.
- Pam Bondi: U.S. Attorney General who received the referral from FHFA.
- Todd Blanche: U.S. Deputy Attorney General and recipient of the referral.
- Sam E. Antar: Forensic accountant who conducted investigative work that supported the FHFA referral.
- James’s Father: Some unnamed father figures were alleged to have signed mortgage documents with James as ” husband and wife” in 1983 and again in 2000.
Public Record Status:
The roles of James, Thompson-Hairston, and her father are documented in property and mortgage records, as cited by the FHFA. Pulte, Bondi, Blanche, and Antar are mentioned as part of the investigation but not as direct participants in the mortgage dealings. Other participants, like closing attorneys or title agents, are not mentioned but would be listed in public closing documents.
Evaluation and Constraints
Access to Public Records:
Mortgage documents such as deeds, loan applications, and powers of attorney are typically public records stored at legal offices, such as the Norfolk City Clerk for the Virginia property and the Kings County Clerk for the Brooklyn property. These files would likely list the mortgage broker, mortgage company, and mortgage loan originator’s names, along with their NMLS numbers. These sources do not provide snippets from these documents, which limits the ability to name certain individuals or entities beyond what is reported.
Lack of Specific Detail:
The political media coverage centers around the allegations. This focus does not mention particular names relating to the brokers or the originators. This lack of detail indicates that the information has yet to be published or exists in documents that are not easily accessible.
Trump’s Legal Defense:
Abbe Lowell, Trump’s attorney, believes the Virginian property was for Trump’s niece. James told an unknown broker that she did not live there. This means a broker was involved, but no further identifying details are provided. For the Brooklyn property, Lowell uses FHFA’s claims and a loan application from 2011 alongside city records, deeming it a four-unit property, as evidence that opposes the FHFA’s accusations.
Political Context:
Trump’s opposing party considers it politically biased, seeing as James has notoriously been pursuing the Trump family. The alleged fraud follows her publicized lawsuits against Trump. This may affect the level of detail available regarding the transactions.
Further Recommendations on How to Access Additional Information
If you want to gain access to the MLO and NMLS numbers of the mortgage broker, mortgage company, and other relevant entities, you need to
Request Public Documents
Virginia Property:
You can call the Norfolk City Clerk or Recorder’s Office to request the mortgage deed, loan application, and power of attorney documents for the 2023 purchase. They should name the lender (who signed as Annie Mac), broker, MLO, and pertinent NMLS numbers.
Brooklyn Property:
To find the property records, mortgages, and building permits for 296 Lafayette Avenue, Brooklyn, from 2001, please contact the Kings County Clerk’s Office in New York. This might help uncover the lender, any brokers, and the loan originator involved.
NMLS Consumer Access
Go to http://www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org to confirm Annie Mac’s NMLS number (338923). Additionally, determine whether any MLOs are associated with these transactions and patiently wait for their names to appear for further investigation.
FOIA Request:
Please request the full FHFA referral letter and any attached documents, such as detailed excerpt transaction information, through the Freedom of Information Act from the FHFA or the Department of Justice.
Follow Ongoing Investigation
As the FBI and DOJ investigations continue, especially after formal charges are made, more information might become available through court or media filings.
The only partially verified entity is the American Neighborhood Mortgage Acceptance Company (Annie Mac), which has an NMLS number of 338923 and serves as the lender for the Virginia property. No source identifies a specific mortgage broker, mortgage loan originator, or associated NMLS numbers for either property. The other individuals involved in the transactions or investigations include Letitia James, Shamice Thompson-Hairston, James’s father, Abbe Lowell, William J. Pulte, Pam Bondi, Todd Blanche, and Sam E. Antar. To fully uncover everything, one must access public records based in Norfolk, Virginia, and Kings County, New York, as these are not entirely available in the exposed recon reports.
Let me know if you need help drafting a public records request or searching the NMLS database.
-
-
Joe Biden signed 1,500 plus presidential pardons with an auto pen. Are those pardons valid? People like Anthony Fauci, his family, and Adam Schiff got pardoned.
-
As things stand now, the veracity of Biden’s presidential pardons, especially those purportedly signed via Autopen, remains an unsettled debate. Please allow me to distill the matter at hand.
Preemptive Pardons
Anthony Fauci, Mark Milley, various members of the January 6th Committee, including Adam Schiff and Liz Cheney, and President Biden’s relatives, such as his siblings and their spouses, were granted pardons. Dr. Fauci and General Milley were not the only ones to receive pardons; Biden’s family members and numerous other non-violent offenders were also granted clemency. The pardons appeared designed to arrest any politically motivated legal actions by the Trump Administration. Moreover, Biden’s administration has pledged to provide extensive clemency for individuals who were imprisoned on non-violent drug charges, including those who were on house arrest due to the COVID lockdowns.
Autopen Controversy
Autopen is a machine that reproduces signatures and has sparked controversy around designating Biden as the operator. Aligned with Trump and the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project, numerous right-leaning news agencies claim that a significant portion of Biden’s preemptive pardons were signed using an autopen instead of being directly signed by the President.
Trump has addressed the media and expressed his view regarding these pardons, stating they are “void, vacant, and of no further force or effect” because they were signed using an autopen and claiming that Biden didn’t know or approve them personally.
According to The Heritage Foundation’s report, there is compelling evidence that Biden’s autographs on pardons for Fauci, Milley, members of the January 6 Committee, and his family members exhibited signs of autopen signatures due to the uniformity of their handwriting across different documents.
Legal Analysis of Autopen Use
The Constitution (Article II, Section 2) gives the President of the United States the power to grant pardons for federal offenses without needing to personally hand-sign each document with a wet signature. Legal scholars have pointed out the following:
No Legal Restriction on Autopen Use:
No specific law or constitutional citation denies pardons bearing autopen signatures. While the Supreme Court has not directly ruled on the issue of autopen-signed pardons, history suggests that the intent behind granting clemency matters more than how the signature was affixed.
Historical Context:
Presidents have employed Autopen for various documents, including bills and other executive actions.
For instance, reports of Biden’s presidency state that he signed a bill extending federal aviation funding using an autopen in May 2024. Other presidents, including Trump, have used standardized signatures in the Federal Register. This does not mean autopen technology was used; rather, it demonstrates that digital or mechanical signatures are commonplace in official documents.
Presidential Intent:
A pardon can only be granted if it reflects the president’s will. If Biden used an autopen to sign off on his pardons, this would meet the legal intent obligation. Still, if it came to light that Biden did not know about the pardons or that aides acted without his consent, the pardon could be invalidated. However, no evidence has been brought forward to prove such claims.
Evidence and Counterpoints
Evidence of Hand Signing:
As BBC Verify noted, Biden has been photographed signing pardons by hand, including for marijuana possession offenses in October 2022. It is unclear if Autopen signed all January 2025 pardons. No evidence suggests that Autopen was exclusively used; thus, it cannot be concluded that all May 2025 pardons were signed using it.
Skepticism from Legal Experts:
This is not because of autopen use, but because some legal minds and DOJ alums have been skeptical about the Biden preemptive pardons, particularly because they seem insufficient to counter non-criminal probes (tax inquiries or congressional inquiries). One risks losing the Fifth Amendment protections that could compel testimony by accepting a pardon.
Democratic Concerns:
Schiff is among many Democrats who expressed concern over preemptive pardons as they argue that it may incentivize subsequent outgoing presidents to abuse this power and issue sweeping pardons, which could be construed as an admission of guilt.
Schiff said he did not want a pardon, but he accepted one.
Trump’s Claims and Current Status
Trump is mistaken when he claims that the pardons are “void” because they were signed using an autopen. The President’s power to issue pardons is nearly unconditional in constitutional law, save for impeachment cases. Also, Trump’s argument insinuates that the pardons could be voided because of Biden’s questionable mental state and ignorance, which in no way constitutes evidence, and Biden has not addressed these claims.
No court adjudicated the legitimacy of these pardons until May 28, 2025, nor is there any record of a legal action brought against them. The Heritage Foundation’s claims have yet to be confirmed by outside commentators, and even if an autopen were used, it would not legally undo the pardons in the present legal framework.
Implications for Specific Individuals
Anthony Fauci:
Preemptive pardons were issued to Fauci to avert possible prosecutions resulting from his handling of COVID. Fauci contended no crimes were committed but accepted the pardon due to the threats against him and his family.
Biden’s Family:
Pardon preemptively issued to James Biden, Frank Biden, Valerie Biden Owens, and their spouses to shield them from affronts targeted based on their political affiliations.
These pardons do not encompass state-level offenses or investigations of a non-criminal nature.
Adam Schiff and the January 6 Committee:
Schiff and other panel members, such as Liz Cheney and Bennie Thompson, were granted pardons to safeguard them from Trump’s prosecutorial threats concerning their participation in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot investigation. While Schiff initially opposed the pardon, they later voiced some pride in the Committee’s work. They expressed support for the Committee’s overall efforts.
From what has been analyzed, Biden’s pardons, including those for Fauci, his family members, and Schiff, would legally stand even if they were granted via Autopen as long as they align with Biden’s wishes. The Constitution does not mandate a physical signature; no legal precedent deals with active Autopen-signed pardons. That’s not to say the matter isn’t contentious, and there could be litigation on the presumption that evidence is uncovered showing Biden did not grant the pardons. Without that, Trump’s assertions that the pardons are void lack a legal foundation.
For further information, you can look into nbcnews.com, bb.com, or The Federal Register to check official documents or offers of legal commentaries. I am happy to chat if you want to discuss some specific pardons or dive into legal details!
-
Who are the 1,500 people former President Joe Biden pardoned with his auto pen?
-
Joe Biden did not deprive one thousand five hundred citizens of their rights. Rather, he pardoned 39 individuals and commuted the sentences of approximately 1,500 persons on December 12, 2024. This was one of the biggest one-day acts of clemency in modern US history. The actions and clemency were done to correct disproportional sentencing of non-violent offenders and provide opportunities for rehabilitation and second chances to individuals whose rehabilitation was evident—details of the Clemency Actions.
Communications (1,500 individuals):
These non-violent offenders received some form of adjudicative instruction during the COVID-19 incarceration stage of the CARES Act. They served at least a year of home confinement and were released from full-confinement prison sentences. Many of these individuals held long sentences due to being convicted of non-violent crimes, but would be served shorter sentences under today’s legal norms and practices.
In particular, some of the individuals are well-known and include the following.
- Timothy McGinn is a stockbroker who defrauded clients’ savings in 2013.
- He is 76 years old, and his sentence is served, infused with his advanced age and former occupation and position, which leads to compassionate potential releases.
- Equally, Jimmy Dimora served as the District 12 commissioner of Ohio and pleaded guilty to violating the bribery act by taking $450,000.
- His claim included lavish trip bribes and other concealed services or benefits.
- Paul Daugerdas, an ex-legal associate, received a conviction as an accomplice in tax fraud with an associated shelter costing the government $1.63 billion.
- Elaine Lovett, owning a medical billing company, was convicted of a Medicare fraud scheme and served time in jail for several million dollars.
Pardons (39 individuals):
- These pardons were given to convicted Americans of non-violent drug offenses.
- The White House described the Americans as contributing positively to the community after conviction.
Some of the examples include:
- Nina Simona Allen, from Harvest, Alabama, was convicted of a non-violent crime in her twenties.
- She later received multiple degrees and works in education.
- She currently volunteers at a soup kitchen and nursing home.
- Emily Good Nelson from Indianapolis was convicted of non-violent drug offenses at age 19.
- She completed her education by obtaining a bachelor’s and master’s degrees and is now working in healthcare as a volunteer counselor.
Sherranda Janell Harris from Connecticut, convicted of federal drug charges at age 24, now works in finance and real estate and models positive community behavior.
Autopen Controversy
This continues from the Trump narrative and The Oversight Project, affiliated with The Heritage Foundation, regarding Biden using an autopen to issue clemency commands. I want to point out the pardon provided to Fauci, Mark Milley, and others who are quite famous for their role in the January 6 committee. Trump claimed these “pardons” are void because he claimed they were signed using an autopen, a device that mechanically reproduces signatures.
Contrary to parts of the Trump narrative, there is no conclusive evidence that 1,500 commutations or 39 pardons issued on December 12, 2024, were signed using an autopen.
- Trump has repeatedly claimed that such clemency actions fail to strip away legal consequences because autopen technology increases the scope of debate.
- In contrast to this claim, many legal scholars articulated that any marks done through autopen mechanisms are legally active for actions such as issuing pardons.
- The defense does not have to be an autographed document, as confirmed by the DOJ’s guidance in 2005 and the federal appeals court ruling in 2024.
- More publicly, photographs exist of Biden signing some executive orders, which have countered claims about him using an autopen exclusively.
Specific Recipients of January 19, 2025, Pardons
- Preemptive pardons were designed to ensure that specific individuals are guaranteed immunity from retaliation after the incoming Trump administration’s political payback.
These included:
- Hunter Biden received a pardon for tax-related offenses and firearm charges.
- Fauci, Anthony, who was responsible for the global pandemic.
- Mark Milley, ex-chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, referred to Trump as a fascist.
- Liz Cheney, Adam Schiff, and Benny Thompson, members of the House January 6 Committee, were also included to prevent them from further investigation.
- His historical figure, Marcus Garvey, was pardoned after his death.
- Leonard Peltier is an activist about Native American issues.
- Others include Saab, Alex, and Abraham Bolden.
Absence of an Exhaustive Document
- The White House erred by not issuing a complete document depicting the commutations of the 1,500 sentences, owing to concerns about privacy and the sheer volume of cases.
- The mostly non-violent offenders who had successfully reintegrated were characterized collectively and described as predominantly drug-related.
- Out of the 39 pardoned individuals, only a few were publicly named, while the others were referred to in vague terms.
Alternative View
- Supporters and critics alike have taken to the internet, with some appreciating Biden’s actions on systemic clemency injustices and arguing that his moves were politically biased.
- In contrast, others claimed they stemmed from an agenda supporting politically divisive figures like drug dealers and scammers.
- Strangely enough, advocates of criminal justice reform called for Biden to act bolder, such as by commuting the sentences of those on federal death row, which he opted not to do during this order (although he later commuted 37 death sentences in January 2025).
- The claims regarding the use of autopen signatures fueled by Trump and conservative factions appear politically motivated.
- Claims legal precedent supports the use of such signatures.
- If looking for specific names rather than those mentioned, the public listing’s absence poses case-scenario restrictions.
- For more details on the clemency processes, visit the Office of the Pardon Attorney at http://www.justice.gov.
-