-
Home Builders Steering Homebuyers To Builders Preferred Lenders
I have seen so many cases where home builders will offer seller or builder’s concession towards closing costs of $10,000 or more only if the homebuyer uses the home builder’s preferred mortgage lender. If the homebuyer uses the buyer’s own mortgage lender and loan officer, the home builder will not offer any seller concession towards closing costs. To up the ante, the home builder also will offer incenstives such as upgrades to homebuyers who use the home builder’s preferred lender. Isn’t this illegal? Isn’t this a case of steering? Why isn’t the CFPB, HUD, and state and federal mortgage regulators jumping in on this. I am sure the preferred lender is giving the home builder a kickback which is an absolute violation of RESPA and mortgage fraud. I archived this article about Home Builders Steering Buyers To Builder’s Preferred Lenders and I suggest you folks read it and save it on your archives. I use it for reference.
https://gcamortgage.com/preferred-lenders-steered-by-builders/
gcamortgage.com
Should I Use Preferred Lenders Steered By Builders
Homebuyers who go with preferred lenders steered by builders get incentives such as builder upgrades, closing cost credits, and upgrades
-
2 Replies
-
Are there any issues concerning the Home Builders Steering homebuyers to Builders’ Preferred Lenders?
What does it mean when a home builder steers homebuyers to their preferred lender? Answer: Steering refers to these lenders as the builders in a settlement. The mortgage lender and loan officer the home builder steers their homebuyers to are represented as the preferred or the allied lenders who mostly offer the funds. Home Builders go out of their way to offer substantial monetary incentives to their home buyers to use the home builder’s preferred lender. For instance, they can pay for the closing costs or offer home upgrades, which are substantial amounts of money. However, the homebuyers only if the buyer use their preferred lender if they want the closing cost credit and the builder incentives and not the lender of the homebuyer’s choice. If the buyer wants more financial inducements in the form of these incentives, the buyer must go with the home buyer’s preferred mortgage company. Otherwise, these may not be offered, which some argue exerts too much pressure on the buyer to go with the vendor lender.
Is steering the home buyers to a preferred lender, a crime? Answer: Steering can be illegal if it violates RESPA. This is since it is a law that forbids such practices as providing kickbacks and unearned fees in mortgage transactions. The builders can allow them to be incentivized legally, but no illegal compensations or such payments should occur between the lender and the builder. The pertinent question here is whether the builder’s preferred lender is giving the buyer a better or fairer price in the process or whether the tendency is sought to suppress or limit the choices for the buyer.
Do the builders have the authority to provide discounts on the condition the buyer opts for their lender? Answer: Yes, concerns over legality aside, builders can offer such incentives. This includes seller concessions for closing costs or improvements. Thereby selling a property as long as the buyer goes through the builder’s lender. This practice is not illegal under the RESPA provisions per se, provided there is no compensatory or referral fee between the housebuilder and the lender. These kinds of incentives are more of marketing approaches employed by the builders to cut down the complexity of the financing process and possibly close the loan.
What is RESPA, and what is its relevance to steering? Answer: This US law is the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. The main purpose of this Act is to prevent consumers from exploitation during the settlement of real estate transactions. Additionally, RESPA disallows most financial relationships among mortgage lenders, realtors, homebuilders, and other parties in a mortgage transaction that can operate without these parties exchanging money. However, steering becomes illegal under RESPA if there is evidence that the builder receives illegal compensation or kickbacks from this preferred lender for referring buyers to them.
In this case, why are builders free to offer incentives for using their recommended mortgage lender? Answer: Builders generally have certain lenders with whom they work to complete the closings quickly and smoothly as planned. It is a common business practice and legal to incentivize potential borrowers through certain benefits, such as crediting closing costs or offering home improvements if one chooses the builders’ suggested lender, as long as it isn’t against RESPA regulations. There is no requirement by the builder to place any incentives for the home buyers who go for different lenders, and the buyers can hunt for the best mortgage deal themselves if they want to.
In what manner does RESPA address the issue of builder-lender kickback schemes by prohibiting builders’ kickbacks? Answer: RESPA expressly prohibits kickbacks given to builders by lenders for a service that bears no utility. It is illegal in the mortgage business to accept and/or give kickbacks or so called referral fees. This is a form of mortgage fraud. Say, no legitimate service was rendered, justifying the payment. In this case, for instance, RESPA will be violated if a builder receives cash or gifts from a lender solely for directing a buyer to them without the lender having any productive actions. However, offers and incentives in the form of closing costs credits are allowed only by the limits of no undisclosed referral fee or illegal payment.
What should homebuyers be aware of if a builder offers incentives for using a preferred lender? Answer: Homebuyers should:
Compare Offers: It is advisable to shop around and find out what other rates, fees, and terms other lenders are offering, as the offer made by the builder’s preferred lender may not be the best deal available.
Read the Fine Print: Make sure that the incentives provided by the builder do not include a higher mortgage rate than normal, such as the payment towards the closing costs or pocketing the expenses for home improvements.
Understand the Terms: Incentives may come with attachments, such as a higher interest rate, so one may want to know how the mortgage cost is computed over a period of time based on the loan.
Why is the Agency, the CFPB, HUD, or other regulators cracking down on homebuilders from steering buyers to a preferred lender? Answer: In general, no legal principles restrict the builders from providing incentives for using preferred lenders. This is as long as there is no illegal kickback or referral fee arrangement. The CFPB and HUD seek to remedy RESPA abuse. Still, in this case, the abusive practices begin with the builders offering incentives to clients and their preferred lenders as long as the preferred lender relation details include the guidelines of the RESPA.
Are there any indications that home builders receive kickbacks from preferred lenders? Answer: While there have been concerns about home builders working with preferred lenders in illegal compensation packages, these allegations would be substantiated piecemeal. According to RESPA, a lender cannot offer a builder any unearned fees or incentives, so the builder directs prospects to them. If such practices occur, they may be escalated to the CFPB, and there may be an investigation.
What can a homebuyer do when a builder’s sales representative strongly encourages them to use a builder’s preferred lender? Answer:
Shop Around: Buyers should compare the conditions and rates the builder’s suggested lender sets to independent lenders.
Ask for Transparency: They should request information from the builder and the preferred lender on whether their loan is competitive and contains any kickbacks.
Report Concerns: If the buyers feel that there was undue pressure or the rep violated RESPA, a complaint on the alleged practices may be made to the CFPB, or a real estate lawyer may be consulted.
Is this permissible if the buyer wants to go with their lender and the builder has another lender? Answer: Homebuyers are free to use their own or other preferred lenders. This is even when the builder provides attractive incentives for using a particular lender’s services. Conversely, the buyer may forfeit certain benefits, such as contributions to closing costs or provision of home upgrades, if they seek an outside lender. The buyer is in a position where some decisions have to be made if they want the incentives, and their lender’s services are of no better mortgage deals for him than what the builder’s lenders offer, which they have to consider the amount of incentive package provided.
How can you claim the incentives without necessarily working with the lender preferred by the builder? Answer: This depends on the builder. Some builders will allow you to use your lender but may have very restrictive marketing allowance policies. In contrast, others will have very generous incentives but will, in most cases, require you to borrow from their legion of lenders. It’s rather unusual to be able to persuade the builder to change their conditions, but it’s still worth trying and asking. However, in most instances, the incentives are always attached to the use of their lender.
Is Builder Steering Illegal?
It is often acceptable to offer incentives for borrowing from a recommended lender. However, there must be conclusive proof of kickbacks, unearned fees, or any act of breach of RESPA for any steering. Homebuyers should obtain mortgage offers from different lenders, as well as other possible costs that could be more obvious. Always report any suspicious activity or marketing to authorities such as the CFPB. This enables the right financial decision to build a home from a builder.
-
Such an issue is intricate and sensitive regarding the mortgage and real estate industry. Kindly allow me to summarize some of the important talking points and put them in perspective:
Legality of the practice:
Offering an incentive to a borrower to approach a favored lender is not specifically illegal. However, if the guideline is crossed, it could be more trouble than it is worth.
Steering concerns:
Although offering incentives is not itself seen as steering, it can become steering when a builder insists that buyers use the builder’s preferred lender. It also becomes steering if the home builder shows signs of false advertising on the terms offered by other lenders.
RESPA violations:
This violates RESPA, particularly the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, which prohibits unlawful representative costs and fees, particularly kickbacks and unnecessary payment, in property transactions. Where the preferred lender is actually engaging in kickbacks to the builder, this is a breach of RESPA.
Regulatory oversight:
The institutions mentioned above, like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, HUD, and state regulators, look into these issues where complaints are made or some issues are raised.
Competitive concerns:
I am unsurprised that the independent loan officers complain about this practice, saying it is unfair competition. Then, I can understand why they do it without saying that indoor outsourcing has been protested against in many industries.
Consumer choice:
The critical question is whether consumers are offered a real choice and properly informed about the information they seek.
Action potential:
Where you have suspicions that illegal practices are taking place, one can:
- Contact the CFPB, HUD, or state regulators with evidence of undue discrimination or unfair practices.
- Document any individual illegal acts by housing finance providers.
- Speak to lawyers about mortgage law.
Industry advocacy:
Associations of mortgage industry players also address these matters. Becoming a member or endorsing such organizations is one approach to changing the status quo.
Consumer education:
It is very important to inform homebuyers of their options and legal rights. Urge them to obtain several offers, including one from the builder’s affiliated lender and others from independent sources.
Competitive response:
Alternative lenders may have to devise strategies to remain in business, including but not limited to providing different types of services or enhanced customer service.
Nonetheless, as much as this inducement of directing the borrower only to use a preferred lender can be termed legal. Based on how it works, it can be analyzed as upsetting from a moral and legal perspective. When discussing evidence of RESPA violations or even further potential illegal activity, those should be reported to the appropriate jurisdictions. It should not be children throwing allegations of wrongdoing here and there. This issue may prevent many people from losing their jobs if handled correctly.