-
Is Kamala Harris That Much of an Idiot?
-
Anyone who spends $1.5 Billion dollars in three months on a campaign and loses by a landslide is a Royal Idiot. Not only that, Kamala Harris lost by a landslide.
-
Kamala Harris is such an unlikeable person because she is such a FAKE.
-
Kamala Harris is hands down the most incompetent politician of all time. She’s such an unlikeable idiot.
-
Kamala Harris has no shame.
-
Kamala Harris is beyond being an idiot. She was never qualified to be President of the United States. She can’t even keep her story straight. Kamala Harris keeps changing her mind and keep lying in front of the camera. Watch this video clip.
-
Can anyone please update us on Kamala Harris? Kamala Harris has been off the radar since her landslide defeat to President Donald J. Trump, spending $1.5 billion on her ill-fated 2024 presidential defeat. Is she going to run for public office? I have heard that Kamala Harris is interested in the California governor’s race. I would become the governor of California, which is in dire need of leadership, as the entire state infrastructure is crumbling. Is she thinking about running for President of the United States in 2028? Many Americans, including top Democrats, are not confident that Kamala Harris will hold any leadership positions. Did Kamala Harris pay her staffers whom she had not paid before? Did anyone come to bail out Kamala Harris? One of Kamala Harris’s top campaign donors, Lindy Li, has been traveling the country and slamming the incompetence of the Biden-Harris Administration and Kamala Harris on many podcasts. Can you please give us a comprehensive overview of the former staffers of Kamala Harris and former supporters? Is Kamala Harris still a powerhouse in the Democratic Party? What is going on with Barack Hussein Obama? Were Barack Obama and Jill Biden the secret people who ran the United States while Joe Biden was in mental degradation?
-
Following her loss to Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential elections, Kamala Harris has kept a low profile, given that her campaign spent and raised roughly $1.5 billion. Below, I have compiled a comprehensive snapshot that analyzes the available intel, scrutinizes the story, and fills in gaps without drifting into mere conjecture.
Current Activities and Future Political Moves for Kamala Harris
As of now, Harris has not held a vice president position since January 20, 2025, which means he has been residing in California for almost 2 years, having moved to Los Angeles. Her schedule is busy with public engagements, such as giving the keynote address at Emerge America’s 20th anniversary gala on April 30, 2025, and the NAACP Image Award ceremony in February 2025. While public life looks enticing for Harris, she hasn’t openly discussed her political ambitions. Although unverified, reports claim that Harris told close aides, “I am staying in this fight,” signaling that she is willing to and wants to remain politically relevant.
California Governor’s Race (2026)
As per various reports, Harris is likely to run for California governor in 2026, as she intends to succeed Gavin Newsom, who is term-limited. Politico and CNN have noted that she plans to decide by the end of summer 2025. Her strong name recognition, history of winning statewide elections, tenure as the California attorney general and U.S. senator, and robust donor network make her a formidable candidate. Some potential Democratic opponents, including California Attorney General Rob Bonta, have suggested that they will step aside if Harris runs, indicating that she might be able to “clear the field” for herself in the primary. However, former U.S. Rep. Katie Porter, former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, and Xavier Becerra, the former health secretary of the Biden administration, are also planning to run. Some analysts do caution that the fierce competition arising from Harris’s polarizing reputation could make the primary more competitive than expected.
A run for governor eliminates any chances of a 2028 presidential bid, as it would be quite challenging to govern California and work on the 2028 presidential campaign, considering the 2026 elections. Advisers see the governor’s role as a career ‘capstone’ instead of a ‘step on’ toward another presidential election. Still, others suggest it may prepare her for a potential run in 2032 or 2036. California’s housing shortages, homelessness, budget deficits, recent wildfires, and more pose significant concerns for any governor. Critics are concerned whether Kamala Harris’s record as a senator and vice president showcases the requisite executive experience to govern.
2028 Presidential Run
Although Harris has not announced plans for a second presidential campaign in 2028, many insiders and analysts from the Democratic Party seem to doubt her political future in the coming years. Her 2024 campaign suffered when Joe Biden decided to drop out of the race. The 107 days leading to the election were underwhelming amidst rising concerns of overused policies and divisive immigration stances. To add salt to the wound, she lost the Electoral College 312-226 and the popular vote to Trump, who, for the first time in 20 years, was a Republican to win the popular vote.
2028 Presidential Campaign: Kamala Harris Figurehead?
Harris is leading early polls above other potential Democratic candidates like Gavin Newsom, Gretchen Whitmer, or JB Pritzker. However, her advisors admit she will face considerable competition in the primaries. Other party members believe that she would be deemed a “figure of the past,” which, paired with the collapse of her campaign in 2020, makes many skeptical and adds to doubt about her ability to sustain a lengthy primary fight. On the other hand, some of the other Democrats believe that her substantial fundraising, $1.5 billion raised in 2024, and her improved ratings by the end of the campaign indicate that she would still manage to be viable.
Harris can entirely forgo running for office and write a book or lead an organization to remain politically active without campaigning. Campaign insiders have suggested that she would not be selling her email and contact lists, which implies that she would like to maintain her political infrastructure for future endeavors.
Harris, a Figurehead?
Sentiment within the Democratic Party is mixed, as Harris does have considerable support. She was the first female, African American, and Asian American vice president; received 74 million votes in 2024; and energized the Democratic base during her brief presidential run.
Allies claim Biden’s late withdrawal and decreasing popularity ratings impacted Harris’s chances. Some, like Donna Brazile, speculate that Trump’s norm-breaking (winning in 2024 after losing in 2020) justifies another Harris bid. Still, many Democrats and analysts lack faith in her leadership come 2028. Political science professors, such as Robert Y. Shapiro and Grant Reeher, point to a lack of interest among primary voters, with some advocating for Whitmer or Elissa Slotkin instead. Many believe the 2024 loss and struggles communicating with working-class voters and the economy make it much easier to doubt her electability in a national contest.
Harris’s latest prospects are stronger in California owing to her track record and donor network. Still, some analysts, including Eric Jaye, warn that she remains a “highly polarizing figure,” making it difficult for her to win even a California Democratic primary.
Campaign Staffers’ Payment
No sources provided definitive proof that Harris did not pay her 2024 campaign staffers. Reports after the election noted her sustained fundraising activities, which some aides felt concerned about donor fatigue, but these concerns were not tied to unpaid staff. Claims on GCA Forums News about Harris saying she is “unemployed” or “broken” (e.g.,) are most likely wrong or exaggerated, as they conflict with reported public appearances and her planning for upcoming campaigns. The financial health of her campaign is indicated by raising $1.5 billion, of which $310 million was in small-dollar donations via ActBlue. However, the data available does not specify pay disbursements to staff.
No reports suggest Harris received any financial aid. Her campaign’s decision to keep the donor list indicates that stable finances are expected for future political endeavors.
Lindy Li and Other Former Supporters
As a Democratic Harris fundraiser, Lindy Li criticized Biden, Harris, and Harris’s 2024 campaign on various podcasts and media outlets. Li, who funded substantial amounts for Harris, displayed disappointment over the campaign’s approach and the administration’s mishandling of economic and immigration concerns. Her criticism lies within the growing angst among Democrats, blaming Harris’s loss on the failure to appeal to the working-class constituents and Trump’s counter-messaging.
Other ex-supporters and aides have mixed insights:
Campaign Staff
Harris’s 2024 campaign brought along a portion of Biden’s staff, including his campaign manager, Julie Chavez Rodriguez, who also worked on Biden’s transition team with Yohannes Abraham (former Biden transition chair) and aides Josh Hsu, Rachel Palermo, and Dana Remus. Certain staffers, like Mike Donilon, moved to different positions after Biden withdrew. Although there are no reports of rampant staff unhappiness related to pay, some aides have anonymously voiced discontent over the inability to divorce Harris from Biden’s record.
Supporters:
During the 2024 elections, Harris was endorsed by key Democrats, including Schumer, Hakeem Jeffries, Pelosi, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Obama, and even Jimmy Carter.
Both Liz and Dick Cheney supported her, along with some Republicans who were unhappy with the party. Yet other supporters, like a former Biden advisor, claimed that Harris would not have won a competitive primary in 2024. Furthermore, leaders of unions that are part of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters criticized her for not addressing the concerns of the socio-economic working class.
Harris’s Impact on the Democratic Party
Harris commands a significant role within the party because of her financial capabilities, prior fundraising roles, and historical profile. That said, she does not remain an unchallenged force. While her approval ratings during the campaign were on the rise, she quickly mobilized and raised 1.5 billion dollars for it, showing that she could rally support. Moreover, no party remains united under a leader or vision, particularly after the 202424 defeat. Newly emerging leaders include, but are not limited to, Newsom, Whitmer, Pritzker, and Pete Buttigieg. While some believe that Harris is intertwined with Biden’s failures, which reduces her influence, others assert that her run for governor could soothe such tensions and distress by establishing her as a state-level leader. Ultimately, however, doubts about party elders seeing her bid for the presidency in 2028 as feasible from an electability standpoint remain.
Barack Obama and Jill Biden’s Role in the Biden Administration
No serious sources suggest Barack Obama or Jill Biden covertly managed the United States from the shadows during the Biden presidency. Speculations concerning Biden’s so-called “mental degradation,” accompanied by allegations of shadow forces controlling him, are largely speculative at best and politically motivated on sites like GCA Forums News. His age and public gaffes understandably fueled such speculation. However, official reports still characterize him as “present” during active decision-making. However, reports indicate the Biden team overscheduled him to fit a controlled “accommodate his stamina” regime.
Barack Obama:
He endorsed Harris with Michelle Obama on July 26, 2024, which kept him situated as a central democratic figure. Obama’s influence was primarily symbolic, supporting the campaign and accomplishing the democratic agenda priorities. There is no evidence he took part operationally in the Biden administration.
As First Lady, Jill Biden was an active and visible supporter of her husband’s agenda but did not participate as a decision-maker in governance. Tackling partisan critiques aside, her claims of running the country are wildly unsupported.
Critical Perspective on California’s Infrastructure
Your comment regarding California’s “crumbling” infrastructure fits the framing of many critiques California faces, such as the housing problem, homelessness, budget deficits, and wildfires. Nonetheless, California is still the world’s fifth-largest economy, and the infrastructure issues are multifaceted, including policy failures, natural catastrophes, and disasters. These are challenges a potential gubernatorial candidate of Harris’s would have to deal with. Her critics, including those from CalMatters, think that her legislative and vice-presidential records do not have any particular notable achievements that would prepare her for the role. Supporters of Harris counter that her experiences as an attorney general and senator lend to her ability to address local and state problems effectively. Harris has a decision to make between a 2026 California gubernatorial election or waiting until 2028 to run for president, both of which have advantages. With her contacts and donor network from California, she would find it easier to run for governor. However, that would stifle her near-term presidential ambitions. While her influence in the Democratic Party is considerable, it is not overwhelming. There is a subdued skepticism regarding her electability on a national level, tempered by strong state-level prospects. Assertions about unpaid staffers are baseless, and while some ex-supporters like Lindy Li have critiqued her, plenty of others have stayed. No evidence substantiates the speculation that Obama or Jill Biden controlled the Biden administration.
Harris’s next steps will depend on how well she manages to tackle a broken party system and her toxic reputation.
Please let me know if you’d prefer more details on factors such as campaign finance information or an in-depth overview of California’s issues!
-
I do not understand how Kamala Harris has moved up the political chain. No brand name and very unlikeable. Does anyone have the latest updates on Jill Biden being charged with elder abuse for not disclosing Joe Biden’s mental illness and the deterioration of his mental acuity? Jill Biden liked the prestige of being crowned the First Lady. Kamala Harris should have known Joe Biden’s deteriorating mental acuity, and so should Joe Biden’s close advisors, especially Karin Jean Pierre, Barack Obama, and all members of his staff. What type of charge will those who hid Joe Biden’s mental deterioration face?
-
I will first answer your question on Kamala Harris’s political rise and, in the second piece, discuss the rumors that Jill Biden and others are hiding Joe Biden’s health status.
Kamala Harris’s Political Rise
The political factors that aided Kamala Harris’s rise are the reasons she did not resonate with voters and did not have a brand name like other candidates.
Political Career Trajectory:
Harris arms herself politically from significant positions in California, beginning as Alameda County prosecutor, then serving as San Francisco District Attorney from 2004 to 2011, and lastly as California Attorney General from 2011 to 2017. Harris built a national profile as a senator from California, which she became in 2016. These roles positioned her as a leader within Democratic politics, especially in a big state like California, which is seen as powerful.
Strategic Positioning:
The visibility Harris gained from narrative-changing moments, such as the Kavanaugh hearings, certainly helped. Although she did not win the 2020 race, it brought her a lot of name recognition and visibility. It also helped Biden feel comfortable bringing her on as a running mate. She could satisfy nearly all demographics, including women, minorities, and progressives. She was considered a safe pick who would not further divide the party, so he could keep pretending to govern from the center after winning the elections.
Party Dynamics:
The Democratic Party strategically promotes individuals who can successfully rally both sides of the party. Harris could appeal to both sides of the aisle because she is a former prosecutor, senator, reformist, and law-and-order voter. As a woman of color, she aligned with the political identity the party sought to embrace after 2016.
Biden’s Exit and Endorsement:
After withdrawing from the race following June’s debate performance, Biden’s endorsement of Harris helped unify party support. His DNC membership and lack of a competitive primary guaranteed her the nomination. This was more about political engineering than personal charm—incumbency, loyalty, and well-timed political winds worked in her favor.
Public Perception:
Describing her as unlikable is not universally accepted as truth. Her rating, while lower than that of other controversial figures, reflects a reality shared by many: a 2024 Gallup poll showed her at 43%. Critics highlight her resume, awkward public persona (like her debate performances), and stubborn tenacity. Supporters cherish her stubbornness, policy-first approach, and perseverance through opposition. She is not popular but reflects more support from the institution than the electorate.
Joe Biden’s Health Concerns: Allegations of Elder Abuse and Cover-Up
As for the concealment of Joe Biden’s mental decline by Jill Biden, Kamala Harris, and others with potential charges to be brought forward, here is a summary of what the situation looks like with the limited information available:
Jill Biden and Elder Abuse Allegations:
Claims:
On GCA Forums, a prominent senior Department of Justice official, Leo Terrell, claimed that Jill Biden may incur charges of “elder abuse” related to her purported knowledge of Biden’s health issues, particularly the aggressive prostate cancer diagnosed in May 2025, yet supporting his candidacy for the 2024 elections. Suspicion arose after Trump Jr. expressed concern over what he, among others, perceived as an undisclosed cancer diagnosis of metastatic prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 9 and bone metastases. (Donald Trump Jr. Clip).
Context:
The allegations arise from the mental decline Biden demonstrates post-presidency, such as during the debate in June 2024, and accusations made against him that he is being “hidden.” Many Jill and Joe Biden critics argue the case is elder abuse, where caregivers keep older people out of the public eye while forcing them to participate. As pushed by the inner circle surrounding him, Jill Biden is one of them.
Status:
As of May 28, 2025, there is no evidence that formal charges have been brought or that the DOJ is actively investigating Jill Biden. Terrell’s comments appear to stem from personal beliefs. They are ex parte statements posted to GCA Forums News without any procedural basis from the DOJ.
Legal scholars have pointed out that elder abuse cases usually center on the intent of inflicting damage or injury, which in this case would be extraordinarily difficult to prove without evidence demonstrating purposeful avoidance of the truth.
Counterarguments:
The Bidens strongly rebutted allegations that they suffered from cognitive decline. During their joint appearance on The View in May 2025, they countered the so-called “mental nosedive” narrative, with Jill saying, “Nobody saw how hard Joe worked.” Joe said he stepped back to avoid fracturing the Democratic coalition. Some medical professionals are divided—some believe low levels of screening for men over the age of seventy could have masked Biden’s cancer. In contrast, others, including Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, contend it likely emerged during his presidency.
Kamala Harris, Advisors, and Staff:
Claims of Cover-Up:
Former California gubernatorial hopeful Antonio Villaraigosa noted that both Kamala Harris and ex-HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra reportedly played a part in hiding Biden’s mental deterioration. Posts on X, like those by @libsoftiktok and @SteveGuest, are claiming Biden and Harris’s team conspired to shield the president’s condition from public exposure based on a WSJ story about national security briefings being rescheduled around Biden’s so-called “good days” and “bad days.”
Specific Individuals:
Karine Jean-Pierre:
Stemming from her exercising the duties of White House Press Secretary, she came under fire for evading queries regarding the president’s health.
No definite charges have been laid out, but her critics opine that she contributed to the cover-up.
Barack Obama:
There is no evidence of Obama participating in a cover-up. Reports suggest that he voiced some concerns privately after the debate but went on to endorse Biden publicly.
Advisors and Staff:
In Original Sin and from people like Michael LaRosa, there is a claim made about a “culture of cover-up” in the Bidens’ White House, which involved some aides, including Jeff Zients, Mike Donilon, and Anthony Bernal, behaving in a non-transparent manner. However, members of Biden’s team, including Donilon, claimed there was no purposeful cover-up, insisting it was “collective denial.”
Potential Charges:
No suspects have been identified, and no masking behavior relating to Biden’s health has been legally charged against Harris, Jean-Pierre, Obama, or Biden’s staff. Elder abuse laws differ from state to state. Still, on the federal level, any charges fall under intent to defraud or neglect. It is often politically motivated to claim cover-ups since they are ethically questionable. Still, there needs to be defined proof to circumvent criminal activity prosecution. The claims stem from political adversaries, especially those siding with Trump, yet lack any substantiated legal evidence.
Current Sentiment:
The notion of liberal media and conservatives fueling the cover-up story contributes largely to their followers, who blame a concealed narrative, including the COVID-19 pandemic and Biden’s controversial cancer diagnosis.
These allegations still do not have legal backing. For example, Biden’s team, the Democrats, asserts that they effectively managed his health issues, attributing any oversights to their inherent complexity.
Critical Perspective
The criticisms from Donald Trump’s supporters attempting to delegitimize Jill Biden and others stem purely from politics and attempt to undermine the Biden administration following a potential loss in the 2024 election. While there are legitimate concerns regarding transparency when discussing Biden’s debate performance and his cancer diagnosis, the jump to “elder abuse” or some form of criminal charges lacks a credible basis and appears to be politically motivated. Harris holding the vice presidential spot places her in a difficult position. While some may perceive her silence as a lack of honesty, others may see it as a pledge of loyalty to safeguard the administration. The nature of these allegations, without tangible action, seems more poetic than real.
Feel free to let me know if you need me to check any sources or want details on a particular aspect!