-
Kamala Harris Offer Money For Supporters
Kamala Harris is paying for supporters. A true scum at its highest level. CMV: Saying Kamala Harris was a “DEI hire” or that she feels “entitled” to the Presidency or that she thinks it’s “her turn” are the same kind of arguments that were used against Hillary Clinton, and they are BS.
https://youtu.be/lILjbTjiZng?si=YhNDRd2dgfbxAfHQ
-
This discussion was modified 2 months, 3 weeks ago by
Gustan.
-
This discussion was modified 2 months, 3 weeks ago by
-
2 Replies
-
Your argument counters the dominant explanation of Kamala Harris and connects her criticisms with those of Hillary Clinton. Here, we present why these arguments may resemble each other and why they may be considered baseless or prejudiced:
“DEI Hire” Argument:
Comparison to Hillary Clinton: Similar to how some people called Hillary Clinton a “token” candidate who was only running for the sake of gender representation, others describe Kamala Harris as a “DEI hire,” suggesting that she was selected due to being black and female rather than for what she is.
Counterpoint: This trivializes their extensive accomplishments in life so far. Like Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris has enjoyed a long history of public service, legal background, and political experience. It undermines their careers by discussing their candidatures in terms of identity politics.
“Entitlement” and “Her Turn” Arguments:
Comparison to Hillary Clinton: Besides being labeled as ‘entitled’ by critics who believe she thinks it’s ‘her turn,’ similar terminologies are used against Kamala Harris, suggesting that her ambition is unjustified.
Counterpoint: These arguments often reflect societal discomfort with ambitious women in power. Harris and Clinton have been ambitious in their careers, which is common among politicians. However, when these traits are framed negatively, it suggests a double standard since few criticisms leveled at male politicians with comparable ambitions are the same.
Underlying Bias:
Gender and Race Dynamics: Also, owing to race, given that they are both women, they encounter unique challenges from criticisms founded on deep-seated biases that target them. Peterson, stationed within modern American culture, can thus be seen as embodying its racial, ethnic, and sexual diversity. On occasion, such biases may manifest themselves where there is doubt about legitimacy or qualifications, irrespective of the achievements of those involved.
Broader Context: Furthermore, the fixation on her identity or perceived entitlement detracts from substantive policy discussions or her qualifications. Clinton’s campaign was often overshadowed by stories about her character and motivations rather than focusing on what she believes in or has done.
Impact on Public Perception:
Delegitimizing Accomplishments: By framing Harris or Clinton as being driven by entitlement or as tokens of diversity, these arguments can delegitimize their achievements and reinforce harmful stereotypes. It may also feed into the wider narrative that women and minorities should not be valued in positions of power.
Political Strategy: Conversely, such claims may function strategically to undermine their candidacies by shifting the focus from their policies and qualifications to personal attributes that raise controversy or doubt.
Conclusion:
The “DEI hire” argument against Kamala Harris, the “entitled” to presidency argument, and the ‘her turn’ argument is reminiscent of criticisms Hillary Clinton faced. Both arguments are rooted in biases that often undervalue the qualifications and ambitions of women in politics. They detract from a more meaningful discussion about their policies, qualifications, and leadership abilities. In this light, these arguments may seem unjustified but do not reflect who they are as political leaders.
-
Kamala Harris is incompetent, and not popular among voters. There’s no way Kamala Harris has the votes to get elected to become the President of the United States. So what does she do? Kamala Harris lies and buys supporters like Danny Vesokie, President of Affiliated Financial Partners says. Here’s the California Sheriff who accuses Kamala Harris of lying that she has the endorsement of the Sheriff.
http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx61fmQlnUCzNLWOXLlhOuyGSUf1_FXnlE?si=wy6WWA0-NfMMbCLu
youtube.com
California sheriff used in Kamala campaign ad says he doesn’t endorse Harris, who ‘did nothing’ to halt border crossings, cartels: report https://nypost.com/...
