-
What Type of People Become Cops
Certain types of people become police officers. Many, like Jeremy DeWitte of Florida, are habitual police impersonators. Jeremy DeWitte wanted to become a police officer ever since he was a child. In high school, he enrolled in the police explorer program for those who wanted a career in law enforcement. The police wanna be Jeremy DeWitte impersonated a police officer when he was 17 years old at a gas station where he flashed a counterfeit badge to get a free badge. That ruins any chances of Jeremy DeWitte becoming a police officer. However, on over a dozen occasions, Jeremy DeWitte impersonated a police officer through his funeral escort business, Metro State. He has motorcycles and patrol cars resembling those of a police officer, and he has still stood in many outstanding trials of police impersonation. My question is what makes someone infatuated with becoming a police officer? Is it the power cops have? Is it the qualified immunity that police officers have? Is it because the wanna be cop got picked on in high school and now, since he is an adult, wants to get revenge by having a badge and a gun? Is it to impress women and get laid because many women love men in blue? Is it the power they have to control women and cuff them to get intimate with them? Do they understand that police officers only have qualified immunity and arrest power when hired by a law enforcement agency? Many educated people, like doctors and lawyers, give up their high-paying salaries to become a cop for a fraction of what they can make. Is there a study on why people have dreamed of being a law enforcement officer? What makes them want to become a cop?
-
4 Replies
-
People might have different reasons for joining the police force or even pretending to be one. Here are a few:
Power and Authority:
- Control and command are big draws to the police force, as they come with power and prestige.
- A cop’s presence alone deters many.
- Enjoyment in being in a position of control partly explains this.
Qualified Immunity:
- This legal doctrine describes the immunity that law enforcement officers get when they are not held liable for actions undertaken during their duties.
- In the form of job security, protection is an allure for some.
Revenge or Retribution:
- This is the main idea stemming from bullying.
- For those who were bullied and picked on, power and respect as police officers enable them to seek revenge on those who taunted them.
Social Standing and Respect:
- A police badge has notable social standing, respect, and societal admiration.
- These factors can be appealing to people who seek social approval.
Attraction and Relationships:
- Some people erroneously choose to pursue law enforcement careers, expecting it to enhance their romantic prospects.
- The stereotype that women are attracted to men in uniform fuels this perception.
Power Over Others:
- Women who fantasize about controlling particular scenarios often find these notions compelling.
- The ability to arrest and detain people grants a form of law enforcement power that goes beyond simple jurisdiction.
Sense of Responsibility and Duty:
- Individuals with strong community ties hope to make positive impacts.
- For them, “protecting and serving” the community is equally motivating as a civic duty.
Adrenaline and Thrill:
- Those interested in thrill-seeking are often fascinated with police work because it is dangerous and has the potential for high-risk scenarios.
Changing Careers and Personal Fulfillment:
- As you highlighted, some educated individuals abandon well-paying jobs to work as police officers.
- This could be driven by a desire to pursue a more meaningful career or serve a specific life purpose.
Psychological Aspects:
- There may be underlying psychological issues, such as the need for order, the desire to belong to a certain group, or the interest in conducting research.
- Research focused on what motivates people to become has included some surveys done by academic and law enforcement bodies.
- These examine background information, psychology, and social factors.
- Still, the reasons remain complex, multifaceted, and often nuanced from individual to individual.
For people like Jeremy DeWitte, his obsession with wearing the police badge might stem from several reasons, compounded by his wish for authority and recognition that comes with the position, without considering legal or ethical boundaries.
-
Reasons people want to become police officers are rarely simple and usually mix personal hopes, life experiences, and wider cultural ideas about heroes and the law. Extreme stories like that of Jeremy DeWitte show what can happen when someone becomes obsessed with the badge for unhealthy reasons. Yet, they also remind us that the pull of policing touches almost everyone in different ways. In the next few paragraphs, I look at the motives you’ve asked about-power, the shield of qualified immunity, a thirst for revenge, the job’s romance, and a wish to control events, and pair those with research findings to paint a fuller picture of why men and women join the force.
Key Motivations for Becoming a Police Officer
People choose a career in law enforcement for personal and public reasons. Some are noble, like wanting to help others, while others, such as the urge for respect or authority, may seem more self-centered. The list below collects the main themes in studies and conversations about why folks become police officers.
Desire to Serve and Protect the Community
- Many recruits start police work because they feel a strong duty to keep their neighborhood safe.
- Research published by the FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin shows that many join the force hoping to “save the world” or, at least, make a small corner of it better.
- They often think of the badge as a symbol of honor, a way to stand for public safety and fairness.
- The International Association of Chiefs of Police supports this belief by saying officers should “serve the community by safeguarding lives and property.”
- That promise rings true for recruits who want to pitch in and protect others.
- Even so, comments on social media, especially GCA Forums, show doubt about how common this motive is, with some users arguing that the pull to power or respect is just as strong or even stronger.
Attraction to Authority and Power
The idea of wielding power-stamped badges, holstered guns, and having the final say in a tense moment can pull certain people toward policing more than a wish to help others. Take Jeremy DeWitte; his endless parade of badges and flashing patrol-car lights points not just to admiration for cops but also to a hunger for the status those symbols promise.
Psych scientists often link a craving for control to careers where you set rules and steer other lives. Being able to make life-or-death calls and knowing that every traffic stop could flip like that reeds plenty of adrenaline for folks who thrive when stakes are sky-high. The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin even touches this pull in its broad look at officer careers.
Scanning posts on GCA Forums shows plenty of users’ names as the real push. A common thread is that people bullied, shoved aside, or ignored as kids later chase the badge to flip the script and tower over those who once crossed them. Jeremy DeWitt fits that picture: his long, fake police show may grow from an old dream of stepping straight into the respect and strength he linked with sirens since he was little.
Qualified Immunity and Legal Protections
- Qualified immunity protects officers from being sued unless they break a known rule.
- Many people look at that shield and call it a perk of the job, but research shows it rarely pulls recruits into police work.
- Most officers only notice the protection after wearing the badge.
- Still, legal experts argue that the doctrine makes it tougher to hold bad actors accountable.
- That reality could attract someone who wants a career with fewer personal risks.
- Yet, very few recruits join the force thinking about court cases because the rule sounds dry and doesn’t appear in recruiting talks.
Revenge or Compensation for Past Experiences
- Stories keep floating online about former outcasts trading past pain for a badge, hoping to settle a score.
- While a few examples, like DeWitte, point in that direction, solid evidence shows that motive rarely fills police academy classrooms.
- Research highlighted in the FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin shows that many cops carry heavy childhood baggage, like bullying or other trauma.
- Because of that baggage, some officers may pick this job to feel powerful or to shield others from pain they once knew.
- Still, that drive usually comes from trying to fix their hurt, not a plan to get back at anyone.
Social Status and Romantic Appeal
- Wearing the badge places officers on a social pedestal that shines bright for anyone craving attention or praise.
- The uniform, the authority, and the cameras mean people see them first, which can boost the look-impressive charm you mentioned.
- There’s no formal research showing that people join the police to impress a date, but many TV and movie heroes wear badges.
- Police point out that officers build tight networks and earn a lot of local respect, feelings that feel good and validate them socially.
- On the other hand, claims that some recruits use the uniform to control women or act inappropriately pop up mainly in misconduct headlines, not in regular career studies.
- Such tactics clash with the IACP Code of Ethics, which asks every officer to protect people’s rights and privacy, plain and simple.
Career Stability and Benefits
- Police jobs come with steady work, pay that looks good next to many entry-level openings, and long-term perks like pensions and health plans.
- Some social media posts remind us that rookie salaries often rival or beat starting pay in fields requiring a full college degree, which can pull talent from nursing or law school.
Room for Growth, Even from Uncommon Start Points
- Goodwin College points out that policing usually comes with clear ladders to move up once an officer has a criminal justice degree, making it attractive to professionals who want a new career.
- Rarely but possibly, someone trained as a doctor or lawyer may choose law enforcement for a renewed purpose or to ease the pressure that comes with those fields.
Adrenaline and a Truly Ever-Changing Job
- Because policing never follows a single playbook, Police1 highlights that no two workdays look the same, an idea that pulls in people who run toward excitement, problem-solving, and surprise puzzles.
- Officers routinely face choices that can save or cost a life, says the FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, drawing in anyone who craves the edge of high-stakes duty.
- For fans of the job like DeWitte, the lights, the badge, and that signature wail of a siren only add to the pull, even if he sometimes seems more caught up in the show than the grind behind it, as his impersonation hints.
Childhood Dreams and Everyday Heroes
Many future officers, DeWitte included, get hooked on law enforcement as kids, often thanks to a parent in uniform, a cop TV show, or youth groups like Police Explorers. Those moments plant the seed that may never fade.
Research from the National Institute of Justice shows that good role models and community programs featuring real officers can nudge people toward genuine careers in police work. Yet if those opportunities vanish or feel unreachable, some individuals, like DeWitte, twist that longing into pretending to be an officer.
Why Some Individuals Become Fixated: The Case of Jeremy DeWitte
Jeremy DeWitte’s story is a striking example of that dangerous turn. By running a funeral escort business under the name Metro State, using sirens, fake badges, and police-style cars, he seemed drawn to the job’s duties and the power and badge viewers automatically respect. Several reasons explain such a deep obsession.
Identity and Self-Image
His early years in the Police Explorer program and first impersonation at 17 hint that wearing a badge has shaped how he sees himself for a long time. Research shows that people with shaky self-esteem often chase big, respected roles, like police officers, hoping the title will patch their inner doubts and earn public admiration.
Does DeWitte Want to Be a Cop?
Power Fantasy
- Everything about how he dresses, the gear he flashes, and even how he talks feels straight out of a cop show.
- Expert observers, including the FBI’s Law Enforcement Bulletin, remind us that a few people chase fake badges to rush to call the shots. If that’s true, it explains why DeWitte pretended to be one of the real boys in blue.
Inability to Achieve Legitimate Status
When he first jumped into the role at age 17, he probably crossed an invisible line that all but shut the door on a real police career. Modern background checks and strict ethics rules weed out that kind of misstep. After getting blocked, he may have dug deeper into the fantasy, fabricating a badge-heavy identity with help from Metro State.
Studies on Motivations for Becoming a Police Officer
Though no single report answers why people lace up police boots, a handful of studies still shine some light:
FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin (2015)
- A major piece from the Bulletin says rookie dreams often boil down to serving others, solid job security, or the thrill of never facing the same day twice.
- Stress and tough calls later tweak those hopes, but the early spark usually stays at the core.
Goodwin College (2022)
More recent research at Goodwin points out that a real urge to protect and the edge a criminal justice degree now gives on the street keep the ladder pulling in recruits.
National Institute of Justice (2019)
Women and minority recruits are valued for skills like clear communication and building community trust, hinting that social impact is an extra reason agencies hire them.
Police (2024)
People enter the force mainly because they love the job, enjoy brotherhood or sisterhood, and want to make neighborhoods safer, even though they know the stress and scrutiny that come with the badge.
These reports show that the call to serve mixes caring motives, practical needs, and the human urge for respect and purpose.
Exceptions like DeWitte exist, yet his case springs from an unhealthy hunger for power, not from the everyday goals most recruits bring.
Addressing Specific Questions: Do They Understand Qualified Immunity and Arrest Powers?
- Most hopeful recruits do not wake up dreaming about qualified immunity or the exact limits of arrest authority.
- Those legal details usually appear during academy training or on the street once officers start working.
- Impersonators like DeWitte may know that badges grant clout, but they lack real knowledge of where it ends since pretending to be a cop breaks the law by definition.
Why Do Educated Professionals Switch Careers?
Doctors, lawyers, and other college-trained workers sometimes trade their white-collar desks for a police beat because they want more action, a closer connection to people, or simply less stress from endless deadlines.
Police work can promise community impact and job variety, so the switch looks appealing, even if the lower paycheck stops many would-be recruits cold.
Motives for joining a police force range from a real wish to help neighbors to the thrill of wearing a badge and carrying a gun.
Some, like Jeremy DeWitte, chase the image so hard that they cross into creepy, almost obsessive territory, often because old hurts or failures leave them feeling small.
Plenty of recruits come for genuine service, but others seek status, control, or pay that matches their schooling, research shows, and each story is different.
Anyone thinking about the badge must sort out their reason and ensure it is based on honesty, respect, and public trust if they want their career to last.
-
In this post, we will explain the history of New York Attorney General Letitia James’s mortgage fraud allegations and how she enriched herself from mortgage fraud. We will also delve into the fraudster and snitch Sam Antar. Sam Antar is a Democrat Whistleblower who stumbled into the mortgage fraud committed by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Letitia James has been in the mortgage fraud game since she was 21.
History of New York Attorney General Letitia James Mortgage Fraud Allegations and the Role of Sam Antar
New York Attorney General Letitia James became a household name after taking the legal fight against former President Donald Trump and his businesses into the courtroom. Still, a different story emerged in April 2025 when allegations of mortgage fraud began to circulate. The claims center on several properties she owns in Brooklyn and Norfolk, Virginia, and they allege that James may have bent the truth about the homes’ value and condition to secure better loan rates. Forensic accountant Sam Antar, who once helped expose fraud at his family’s company and now calls himself a Democrat whistleblower, first made the matter public, saying he dug through documents and spotted what he viewed as red flags. Readers will find a balanced review of the timeline, Antars’ involvement, and whether James personally gained from these acts, along with a careful look at the documents, the legal scene, and the broader political climate. As of July 6, 2025, federal prosecutors have not filed formal charges, and the inquiry is still open and ongoing.
Quick Background on Letitia James
Letitia “Tish” James, a Democrat, has been New York’s Attorney General since 2019, making her the first Black woman to land the job. She’s built a name as a tough watchdog, going after big companies and powerful politicians. Most people across the country learned her name when she filed a civil fraud case against Donald Trump in 2022. That suit ended with a $454 million judgment, and interest pushed the total past $500 million. Because she has spent years chasing people for dishonest money moves, critics–Trump among them–now find it extra pointed to call her dishonest in return.
Origins of the Mortgage Fraud Allegations
The first public claims about James popped up in early 2025, thanks mostly to Sam Antar. Antar, who once spent time behind bars for his role in the 1980s Crazy Eddie electronics scam, now works as a forensic accountant, shining a light on cheating in business. He described himself as a Democrat with no political motive. He said he found odd patterns in James’ house deals after a seven-month look into the records. Antar shared his results on his White Collar Fraud blog. That post led the Federal Housing Finance Agency to make a criminal referral in April 2025. By May 2025, the matter had moved up to a full investigation by the FBI and the Justice Department.
Timeline of Allegations
1983 and 2000 (Queens Property):
Antar claims that when James was just 21 in 1983, she signed mortgage papers for a Queens house listing herself and her father as husband and wife instead of co-borrowers. He argues that the mistake reappeared in 2000 to help secure another loan. James’ lawyers have said the wording was simply a clerical mix-up that was fixed in later documents.
2001 (Brooklyn Brownstone Purchase)
In February 2001, James bought a brownstone on Lafayette Avenue in Brooklyn. A city certificate from January 26, 2001, shows the building has five apartments- one in the basement, one on the first floor, one on the second, and two spread across the third floor. Antar says, however, that James always called it a four-unit building whenever he filled out mortgage papers or building permits. He did this to qualify for the friendlier loan program meant for buildings with four or fewer units, a program that usually comes with lower rates and easier rules.
2019 (Brooklyn Brownstone Refinance)
Antar claims that when James refinanced the Brooklyn property in 2019, he again passed off the building as a four-unit home. By doing so, he may have avoided the higher rates and tougher terms that come with loans for five-unit buildings.
In August 2023, James bought a house in Norfolk, Virginia, for $240,000, teaming up with her niece, Shamice Thompson-Hairston. They took out a $219,780 mortgage, and a power-of-attorney document James signed on August 17 called the new place her “principal residence.” James lives in New York because of her job as Attorney General, and lenders usually reward primary residences with lower interest rates than they give to vacation or rental homes. Later, James’s lawyer said the wording was a simple mix-up and pointed to other papers where she showed the Norfolk house was not meant to be her main home.
Sam Antar, the man who blew the whistle on the deal, has a past that raises more questions about why he got involved. In the 1980s, Antar was the Chief Financial Officer at Crazy Eddie, a stereo and TV chain, skimming cash and pretending it was worth more than it was. After prison, he retrained as a forensic accountant, helping the government and big law firms catch crooks hiding money. Antar says his look into James’s records was his idea, not a party hit, and he notes that he votes Democrat to silence claims he is being partisan.
Investigation Process
Antar says he spent almost seven months digging through public property records, mortgage papers, and financial forms related to James. On his White Collar Fraud blog, he uploaded ten mortgage files. Yet none labeled the Brooklyn building a five-family house, even though a 2001 certificate of occupancy shows it was approved that way. He also pointed to utility records listing six separate electric accounts, five apartments, and a common staircase. However, he did not share full copies of those to support the claim.
Key Claims
According to Antar, the gap between the four-unit story, the five-unit reality, and James’s declaration of the Virginia property as her main home adds to mortgage fraud. He argues that the 2001 certificate should still count today because James never asked the city, using an Alt-1 form, to change the number of allowed apartments officially. In his view, doing so was her legal duty.
Public Statements
On GCA Forums News, Antar has called James a fraud for four decades and promised readers he has overwhelming proof buried in mortgage files and financial forms dating back to 2019. He brushed off critics in the press, including a New York Daily News editorial that labeled his evidence flimsy. He maintains he is working on this case alone and has never been told to look into James by anyone in the Trump camp.
Allegations of Enrichment
The charges claim that James boosted her wealth by winning friendlier loan terms through false statements, possibly saving her thousands in mortgage and insurance bills. The main points are:
Brooklyn Property:
- By listing the Brooklyn brownstone as a four-unit building rather than five, James is said to have qualified for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans, which have lower rates and smaller down payments than the commercial loans needed for five-unit properties.
- The FHFA alleges this false labeling appeared on several loan applications and a 2019 refinance, possibly sparing her huge costs over twenty-four years.
Virginia Property:
- Claiming the Norfolk house as her primary residence would let James lock in a lower interest rate.
- Lenders view loans on main homes as less risky than those on second homes or investment properties.
- She would benefit through smaller monthly payments and lower overall interest over the loan’s life.
Queens Property:
- The husband-and-wife statement made in 1983 and again in 2000 is said to have helped James meet certain lending requirements.
- Still, the exact dollar impact is hard to trace today because those deals happened so long ago, and the records have since been fixed.
- Even so, no public document shows how much money James gained, making the true value of each claim hard to measure.
- Her lawyer, Abbe Lowell, insists that any mix-up was a simple clerical mistake with no plan to cheat, which he argues should erase the idea that she intentionally enriched herself.
James’s Defense and Counterarguments
- Attorney General Letitia James and her lawyers say the accusations against her are false and are just payback for the lawsuits she filed against Donald Trump.
- They call the claims political noise and point to four main arguments to support their position.
Brooklyn Property:
- James’s team notes that since 2001, she has lived in the brownstone in Brooklyn, a four-unit building, while renting the other three units.
- They say the city records show four units, so the 2001 occupancy permit, dated long before she took office, does not change that picture.
Virginia Property:
- Lowell admits a slip in the power-of-attorney paper made Norfolk look like James’s main home.
- Still, he points to later papers where she told the mortgage broker, in bold, all-caps, that the house would belong to her niece, not to her.
- Buying the place was meant to help build family money over time, a goal she learned from her father.
Queens Property:
- The husband-and-wife label on the deed came from a clerical mix-up many years ago.
- It was fixed later, and James says it proves no ongoing scheme to hide fraud.
Political Retaliation:
- In a letter posted online, lawyers James and Lowell say the accusations, pushed by Trump supporters like FHFA chief William Pulte and Congresswoman Elise Stefanik, look like a wider “revenge tour” aimed at James for her cases against Trump.
- Lowell also wrote to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, calling the referral “improper political retribution” and pointing out that Pulte picked only certain documents while leaving untouched true filings.
- James says she has personally been harassed and that neighbors and family in Virginia have faced the same ugly treatment.
- Defiant, she told NY1, I will not be silenced, I will not be bullied.
Legal and Political Context
- The accusations come at a tense moment, since James has pushed many of Trump’s biggest legal fights.
- In April 2025, the FHFA, then led by Trump-named director William Pulte, passed along a tip about possible breaches of wire fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud, and false statements to banks (18 U.S.C. 1341, 1343, 1344, 1014).
- If those claims are true, the court could pay steep fines and sentences of up to thirty years for any bank fraud hitting a major lender.
- As of May 2025, the FBI Public Corruption Division and the U.S. Attorney in Albany looked at the case together.
- A grand jury had already started issuing subpoenas in the Eastern District of Virginia.
Legal minds can’t agree on the case against New York Attorney General Letitia James:
Prosecution View:
- Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani and ex-assistant U.S. Attorney Gene Rossi say the claims matter.
- They argue that if someone lies about where they live to get a better mortgage, that is mortgage fraud.
- Rahmani also points out that New York law forces elected officials to stay in-state so that the Virginia issue could reach even deeper waters.
Defense View:
- Lawyer David Lowell counters that the claimed mistakes are tiny and show no intent, and intent is what real fraud cases rest on.
- He points to the conviction of former Baltimore State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby for similar errors, yet adds that James has always said the Virginia house was not her main home.
Political Angle:
- Analyst Nicole Brenecki believes the legal risk is real.
- However, the bigger shake-up will be political because of James’s high profile and the Trump team’s fingerprints on the fight.
- Ex-district attorney Matthew Mangino warns that going after James might scare other Trump critics off speaking out.
Critical Analysis of Evidence
The evidence from Antar and the FHFA leans on document mix-ups, yet a few big questions still stand.
Brooklyn Property:
- A 2001 certificate of occupancy looks important.
- Yet, James’ team points out that other records list it as having four units.
- Without photos or inspections showing five actual units and proof that James knew and lied about this, the fraud claim here starts to lose its bite.
Virginia Property:
- A power-of-attorney form raises eyebrows, but James’ earlier comments to the lender muddy the waters on whether she meant to cheat anyone.
- Also, her choice not to file a homestead exemption fits her story that the place was always an investment, not a primary home.
Queens Property:
- The husband-and-wife slip was bad, but that error was fixed decades ago, so it matters far less when judging current fraud claims.
Antars’ Credibility:
- It’s hard to ignore that Antars’ past as a convicted fraudster makes people question why he is speaking up now, even if he says he is being neutral.
- His online battles with James, where he called her a Dummy and hinted at new federal crimes, look more personal than purely professional.
- Yet, his forensic skills should still be counted.
- The timing of the claims looks suspicious, coming right when James is fighting Trump-era rules in court.
- Hence, some people wonder if politics is driving the charges.
- Trump’s remarks calling her a crook and the fact that his old aides, including Pulte and FBI Director Kash Patel, are now involved in the case only make it seem like she is being targeted.
Enrichment Claim and How Strong It Is
- Antar and the FHFA say James got richer by bending loan rules to lock in lower rates and sweet terms, but public papers still stop short of putting a dollar amount on that gain.
- Savings from moving a building from five to four units or switching its status from investment to primary home can total thousands over many years.
- Even so, because no one has put out clear numbers, people can only guess how much she gained.
- James points out that she treated the Brooklyn property as four units and bought the Virginia house mainly for her niece, arguing that she did not act out of greed.
Current Status (July 6, 2025)
As of July 6, 2025, the FBI and DOJ probe into James has not produced formal charges yet, and the investigation is still moving forward. A Virginia grand jury is still looking at the evidence. James’s lawyer, Abbe Lowell, shares documents while firmly saying James did nothing wrong. Reactions on X show a deep split: some followers applaud Antar for what they call a truth-telling inquiry, while others shrug it off as nothing more than a partisan hit job. Meanwhile, James is still in her job as Attorney General, fighting day-to-day in court against many of Trump’s choices and helping a nationwide push to save $1 billion set aside for COVID-19 school programs.
Letitia James now faces mortgage fraud claims that began with investigator Sam Antar and grew after an FHFA tipped the matter to law enforcement. The charges allege she changed property details for friendlier loan rates over nearly forty years. Her staff counters that the changes were simple paperwork mistakes and that critics have blown them out of proportion for political gain. Antar, a former Wall Street trader turned whistleblower, speaks from forensic know-how yet carries a criminal past that colors his credibility. A sitting grand jury and an active FBI team are now sifting through documents, and their findings will decide whether formal charges follow. James’s vocal court fights against Donald Trump add a partisan layer that observers on both sides will not ignore. For now, the case highlights the uneasy line between public accountability and the sharper edge of political payback.
You can watch trusted news outlets and search public archives to keep up with each new development in this story. After reading, join the conversation below and tell us what you think the outcome could mean for confidence in our leaders.
https://youtu.be/29XLsTc8Cbw?si=7CSVdlXoNLrauvUe
-
This reply was modified 8 months ago by
Gustan Cho.
-
We all make mistakes. It’s what makes us human, and allows us to grow, evolve, and become better. But the cops in today’s video made such huge blunders that they deserve to wear the title of dumbest police officer ever. Members of law enforcement have authority over our well-being, our freedom, and even our lives. So when they make a dumb mistake, there should be hell to pay. There should always be repercussions for our mistakes, otherwise, we will never learn. However, reality is never that simple. Sometimes, cops do really stupid things, and they get away with it. Will that be the case in today’s lineup of dumbest cops? Let’s find out.
Log in to reply.