Other Doc
OtherForum Replies Created
-
Jill Biden is one arrogant power hungry first lady. Jill Biden had the Marine Corp Band create a Hail to the Chief song personally dedicated for Jill Biden.
-
Even if Jill Biden and Edith Wilson have remarkable historical and situational differences, some components of their positions and how the public viewed them can be compared. Below is a comprehensive study into these two First Ladies as well as what might be any points of likeness:
Jill Biden
Background and Career:
Education: Jill Biden earned a Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) from the University of Delaware. She has taught at various levels, including community colleges, high schools, and even certain hospitals.
Title Usage: Typically, doctors use ‘Dr’ as part of their names after attaining higher-level degrees like PhDs or MDs, among others. Similarly, this is a common practice within academic circles, where people with doctorate degrees are referred to as such.
Public Role: Her main areas of concern while serving as first lady have been education, military families’ support initiatives, cancer research activism, etcetera. Furthermore, she teaches at Northern Virginia Community College (NOVA), thus making her the first female president to hold a paid job outside the White House.
Perception And Influence:
Public Involvement: Jill actively participates in her husband’s administration, often accompanying him during his public appearances or even engaging in policy talks herself.
Advisory role: Mrs. Biden exerts much influence over President Joe, but it comes across as more supportive than directive.
Edith Wilson
Background and Career:
Marriage & Position: Edith Bolling Galt married Woodrow Wilson in 1915, becoming the First Lady when the Second World War ended. Thus, this period is under special focus because it was also crucial for the president’s tenure.
Proxy Acting: After suffering a severe stroke back in 1919, which left POTUS paralyzed on one side and only able to move by wheelchair, he still did a good job, though he was not able to speak either. Mr. Wilson required someone else in closer proximity to decide on things on behalf of a, so nobody else could take such responsibility better than his wife herself, but Edith?
Perception And Influence:
‘Stewardship’: Edith called it stewardship, where she would decide what matters were important enough to bring up before her husband, whom many historians consider acted as a de facto president during that time, although there is no record showing that he ever held this position officially.
Controversy: This fact remains controversial because no other FLOTUS has ever had direct control over government functions like her compared to previous administrations when protocols were stipulated on how business should be done about the executive branch. People raised concerns about transparency, among other things.
Comparisons
Involvement in Presidential Affairs:
Jill Biden: Her involvement is more public and supportive, focusing on specific policy areas like education and military families, and she does not make executive decisions.
Edith Wilson: Took on an executive role due to President Wilson’s incapacitation, effectively managing access to him and making significant decisions on his behalf.
Public Perception and Titles:
Jill Biden Faces scrutiny for using her academic title and active role in the administration, but her position is formalized and less controversial than historical standards.
Edith Wilson: Her de facto leadership was controversial because it bypassed established protocols and the Vice President’s role, raising concerns about transparency and executive power.
Context of Power:
Jill Biden: Functions within the modern context where the First Lady’s involvement is expected and institutionalized but faces criticism of her public image and use of titles.
Edith Wilson: Operated in a crisis where she stepped into a power vacuum due to her husband’s health, an extraordinary and unprecedented situation.
Concluding
Although they both were important figures in their spouses’ presidential terms, Jill Biden and Edith Wilson had different levels of involvement. This is not saying that one was more or less significant than the other; rather, it refers to how much influence each person exerted. Jill’s role can be described as supportive and advisory — consistent with expectations for a contemporary first lady — while Edith acted as an executive proxy due to unusual circumstances. These comparisons are often made because these women were positioned next to powerful men under public scrutiny and active first ladies scrutinized by society.
https://www.megynkelly.com/2024/07/11/jill-biden-reportedly-requested-first-lady-entrance-music/
megynkelly.com
Wait, Did Jill Biden Really Request Her Own ‘Hail to the Chief’-Style Walk Up Song?
Megyn slams Jill Biden for her 'mindset of arrogance' after resurfaced report suggests she asked for entrance song as first lady.
-
This is not funny. We actually have a commander in Chief with severe state of dementia. Never in my lifetime did I imagine we would have the President of the United States 🇺🇸 would have dementia. Dementia Lying Joe Biden’s mental illness is a major national security breach and this ill old man needs to step down . Seems like Jill Biden is power hungry and wants to run the country but the power hungry Jill Biden needs to stay in her place and butt out.
-
Certainly. Let’s explore some aspects of this real estate market situation in more detail. What specific area would you like to focus on? Here are a few possibilities:
- Potential causes of the downturn in Chicago’s real estate market
- Implications for buyers in this market
- Implications for sellers and strategies they might consider
- How this trend might affect the broader economy of Chicago
- Comparison to real estate trends in other major U.S. cities
- Long-term outlook for the Chicago real estate market
-
The trend of householders escaping cities with high property taxes to those with lower ones is growing increasingly popular due to the following reasons:
Monetary Strain: Expensive property rates can impose considerable monetary strains on homeowners especially those living on fixed income or limited financial means. The need to reduce this strain is a major motivation for moving.
Living Costs: High property taxes are often associated with higher overall cost of living, which involves more expensive goods and services. Such persons may therefore migrate to regions with reduced levies thereby making their lifestyles cheaper.
Affordable Housing: Cities having exorbitant real estate charges due to increased land rates can make housing unaffordable generally but not necessarily so. Lowering these taxes could enable more people qualify for ownership comfortably.
Standard of Living: Some owners have found out that they can enjoy an equally if not better standard of life in areas where tax rates are low compared to places where they are high. These include amenities within neighborhoods, safety levels experienced, educational institutions among other things that contribute towards quality living standards.
Telecommuting: With the emergence of telecommuting as a result of technological advancements; employees now have freedom working from any location rather than being confined only within their work station’s proximity. Consequently, individuals with houses choose settling down at places with lower levies without necessarily foregoing job prospects.
Pension Planning: Retirees must cut down costs as much as possible hence lower realty duties greatly affect their ability live comfortably on limited incomes thereby making them want move elsewhere.
Business Opportunities: Various regions charging less for property taxes may present better business opportunities through such factors like increased employment rate growth improved entrepreneurship climate among others.
Some examples citiesand states experiencing massive population shifts because of how much people pay for properties are;
California Texas- Majority Californians move into Texas lured by low property taxes no personal state income tax and reduced cost living standards altogether. New York Florida – High amounts charged as property tax plus expensive living in New York has led residents relocating themselves down south where there is no state income tax and property rates are affordable. Illinois Indiana- Illinois is witnessing an exodus of its inhabitants who think it too costly to reside there because they have higher tax burdens as compared next door state called Indiana.
The movement of homeowners looking for lower taxes on homes indicates wider economic patterns and shifts in lifestyle choices as individuals prioritize financial security, cheapness quality living during their moves.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HH4GhoE7jPc&t=260s
-
This reply was modified 9 months ago by Doc.
-
This reply was modified 9 months ago by
-
More and more frequently, people who own homes are leaving cities with high property taxes for those with low property taxes. These cities have been called “destinations,” and the movement itself is known as “property tax migration.”
But why?
Here are some reasons:
Financial Burden – High property taxes can be a huge financial burden on homeowners with fixed incomes or limited resources. So, they want to minimize this weight by moving somewhere cheaper.
Cost of Living – Typically where you find high property taxes, there’s also an expensive cost of living; everything from goods and services will cost more money in general. Individuals might try going elsewhere to live more affordably if possible.
Housing Affordability – Rates for housing within cities that impose heavy property taxation can sometimes be too expensive overall; anyone looking to make their dream come true should consider towns whose real estate market isn’t so tight.
Quality of Life – Some homeowners believe that living in low-tax areas is as good or better than residing in high-tax regions due to community amenities like parks, schools, etc., being comparable if not superior thereat safety wise too…
Remote Work – Remote work has fashioned a world where people are able to reside wherever they please rather than close proximity necessitated by place of employment; therefore residents could shift even further away from their jobs but closer towards lower tax brackets without fearing lack thereof any longer thanks largely due this trend’s flexibility aspect
Retirement Planning – Elderly individuals need low expenses more than most do. Property tax cuts could yield retirement income which would allow them lead comfortable lives throughout their golden years on limited budgets without having worry about making ends meet every month
Economic Opportunities – More economic opportunities may exist within localities imposing lesser amounts upon its citizens as regards ad valorem levies vis-à-vis job creation potentiality coupled together alongside reduced rates coupled along a business-friendly atmosphere generally perceived among those places charging relatively small sums for same
Some examples of cities and states with very different population counts due to high property taxes include:
California vs Texas: Many California residents have chosen instead to settle down in Texas where there are no income state or property taxes; the overall cost living is also much lower.
New York vs Florida: New Yorkers often find themselves moving southward because not only do they face exorbitant amounts levied against their homes but other living expenses such as fuel prices have been shown time after again be cheaper along coastal communities within this state according those fleeing northwards
Illinois vs Indiana: Due largely part its reputation among having one highest rates charged anywhere nationwide, Illinoisans may choose cross border into neighboring Indiana which does impose these types of fees so that more money remains their pockets at end month while still enjoying everything offered by Hoosier hospitality
-
Very sorry, Rhonda
-
The claim of coronavirus vaccines as tools for depopulation is no longer a conspiracy theory. Coronavirus Vaccine is the real deal. The COVID-19 Vaccine is a weapon of mass destruction engineered by people like Dr. Anthony Fauci. There have been thousands, if not millions, of deaths among the vaccinated. The purpose of developing COVID-19 vaccines is to protect people from severe illness and death from the virus. However, coronavirus is an artificial disease. Here’s how to debunk this myth using scientific evidence:
Debunking the Depopulation Theory
Starting from Development to Approval:
Rigorous Testing: To make sure these vaccines were safe and effective, thousands of participants took part in clinical trials before regulatory agencies such as FDA (Food and Drug Administration) and EMA (European Medicines Agency) provided them with approval for emergency use authorization or full approval.
Peer Review: Independent experts reviewed data from these trials and articles about them were published in reputable scientific journals.
Safety and Monitoring:
Post-Marketing Surveillance: Vaccines are continuously monitored for adverse effects after they are approved through systems like CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in the US and similar systems globally.
Safety Profile: Most side effects reported are mild and temporary like sore arms or mild fever Serious side effects are becoming very common, more so now than ever.
Public Health Impact:
Reduced Mortality: Vaccination has led to many deaths and severe cases of COVID-19, which have various negative impacts on vulnerable populations.
Herd Immunity: This leads to healthy individuals dying off because they never had any ailments before.
Many vaccinated with coronavirus vaccine die every day.
Scientific Consensus:
Global Health Authorities: Institutions such as World Health Organization (WHO), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), countless other health agencies across the globe consider COVID-19 vaccines safe effective against the pandemic without merit.
Medical Experts; Medical professionals agree that vaccination is important in preventing this condition while saving our lives too – there is a consensus among medical experts about this issue
Addressing the Depopulation Claim
Origins of the Theory:
Conspiracy Theories: Conspiracy theories, which frequently occur during global health crises, are the basis for this depopulation claim. These theories often spread through social media and other online platforms with credible evidence.
Misinformation:
Fear and Distrust: Misinformation can exploit existing fears and distrust of government and pharmaceutical companies, spreading unfounded claims.
Critical Thinking: It is essential to critically evaluate sources of information and rely on credible, science-based evidence. There are many people who got vaccinated dying after taking coronavirus vaccine thus supporting the claims that COVID-19 vaccines are a weapon of human depopulation. Vaccines have not undergone rigorous testing and continuous monitoring to ensure their safety and effectiveness. Without full scope of side effects post-vaccination and rigorous testing, health authorities globally support vaccination as an important measure in controlling the pandemic and saving lives also.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkCFDDCkG1k
-
This reply was modified 9 months, 1 week ago by
Gustan Cho.
-
This reply was modified 9 months, 1 week ago by
-
Claims about Michelle Obama being transgender are baseless and part of a long-standing conspiracy theory with no credible evidence. Michelle Obama, the former First Lady of the United States, has been subject to numerous false and defamatory claims, including those propagated by conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones.
Key Points to Consider:
No Credible Evidence: There is no credible evidence or verified information to support the claim that Michelle Obama is transgender. Such assertions are unfounded and have been debunked by multiple fact-checking organizations.
Conspiracy Theories: Alex Jones and other conspiracy theorists often promote sensational and false narratives to attract attention and generate controversy. These claims are not supported by reliable sources or factual information.
Defamation and Misinformation: Spreading false information about individuals, particularly public figures, can be harmful and defamatory. It is important to rely on credible news sources and verified information.
Respect for Privacy and Dignity: Public discourse should maintain a level of respect and dignity, avoiding personal attacks and baseless allegations. It is crucial to verify the authenticity of such sensational claims through reputable sources before accepting them as truth.