Kay Anne
Preferred Realtor PartnerForum Replies Created
-
Great questions and topic of discussion for those thinking on comparing several different mortgage companies as their parent companies.. I read the compensation plan of NEXA Mortgage which is the follows: 275 lender paid compensation, NEXA takes 55 basis points 25 basis point to NEXA up to $3 million and 30 basis points for revenue share up to $3 million up to $3million. Everything over $3 milllion is 100% to the loan originator. 220 basis point to the independent LOAN FACTORY is 250 compensation and $595.00 per file and $500.00 inhouse processing fee for a total of $1095.00 per file and 100% to independent MLO. Don’t know other lenders. Who has the best compensation package.
-
What type of questions should I ask when interviewing with a mortgage company recruiting mortgage net branch opportunities: I will list some of the questions I have but if I forget important questions that are important, I would appreciate it if you can advise and remind me. First question is the compensation of the mortgage net branch, and the recommended compensation for the loan officer? Self-Generated Leads vs Branch Leads. What are the junk and administrative fees, such as tech fees, CRM, etc. Can you operate as a dba and what does that entail and cost? Who does the processing? Contract Processing? Can you hire your own mortgage processors and Loan Officer Assistants, Marketing People? Can I use an overseas Virtual Assistance Company I have been using for many years? Can I operate my own mortgage broker company in Illinois and be with the mortgage net branch company for all other states that my mortgage broker is not licensed?
-
Kay Anne
MemberMarch 5, 2026 at 7:00 pm in reply to: Working For Two Mortgage Companies At The Same TimeYou’ve got part of it right, but a few details are off when you consider the NMLS and state rules that will apply by 2026.
General Principle of Sponsorship
Most states follow the rule that each mortgage loan officer can only have one sponsor in each state. You cannot have more than one sponsor in a state, or be sponsored by more than one mortgage company for work in that state. Even if you own All-World Mortgage Brokers in Illinois, you still have to be sponsored by your own company there, and having a second sponsor in Illinois is not allowed.
Possibilities of Multi-State Dual Sponsorship
Your situation might work in other states besides Illinois. Your Illinois company can sponsor you only for Illinois, while another company, like a lender, can sponsor you in other states where your company does not do business. This is allowed in some states if the state regulators approve it.
Main Exceptions and Limitations
- Only a handful of states—Colorado, Delaware, Maine, Minnesota, Texas, and Washington—let you have more than one sponsor at a time.
- Some states, including Georgia, Montana, Ohio, Oregon, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania, have stricter rules. If certain companies sponsor you there, you are not allowed to have any other sponsors.
South Carolina, Nebraska, and Arkansas go even further, completely banning any other sponsors anywhere.
- Broker vs lender rules: As a brokerage owner, you can do loans in Illinois under your own sponsorship and be sponsored in other states, but be careful. Lenders and compliance teams often question these dual setups because they might cause conflicts of interest. Also, your employer’s rules and agency guidelines, such as the FHA’s rules on working for more than one company, can make this illegal. There have been cases where someone had a main job in Arizona and a secondary one in Illinois, but this only worked when both employers knew about it, and there was no sharing of clients or files.
Before anything, check the NMLS state-specific sponsorship reports and talk with an Ohio mortgage attorney to confirm these things, as the rules do change and Ohio has some unique requirements.
-
Kay Anne
MemberMarch 5, 2026 at 6:33 pm in reply to: Working For Two Mortgage Companies At The Same TimeIs it legal for mortgage loan officers to work for two companies in different states
-
Kay Anne
MemberMarch 5, 2026 at 2:39 am in reply to: In-House Mortgage Processors vs Contract ProcessorsYour question is very good and is very particular to how different mortgage companies structure their business. Your comment about NEXA Lending and SMP is very accurate and demonstrates a textbook example of a business model based on contract processing. In this instance, let’s try to classify what companies tend to use each model.
CompaniesThat Use Contract Mortgage Processing Most
- The principal reason a company implements contract processing is to achieve a more streamlined, assets-light business model that is predominantly centered around sales and origination.
- The idea is to minimize fixed overhead, human resource challenges, and the operational complications of overseeing a large back-office.
The main consumers are:1. Independent Mortgage Brokers:
- This is the quintessential example.
- As a small brokerage, you live and die by your loan volume.
- With a contract processor, you can expand your back-office as your deal flow increases, and avoid the expense of a full-time salary during a slow month.
- This keeps overhead to a minimum and protects your profit margins.
Independent Loan Officers (at Mortgage Banks or Brokers):
This is the NEXA Lending model you explained. Other companies within the same space as NEXA, such as United Wholesale Mortgage (UWM), and competing lenders, are referred to as platform lenders. They provide the LO (Loan Officer) with licensing, a lender umbrella, competitive pricing, and technology, but the LO is treated as an independent business owner.
In this case, the LO covers all their own business expenses, including the cost of processing. They pay a platform (like NEXA) a fee and pay their contract processor (like SMP) separately.
This model grants the LO the highest degree of independence. Your comment about SMP being licensed in all 50 states is a huge benefit to LOs working with these national platforms as they can close loans in any state, meaning LOs do not have to search for a new, locally licensed processor for each transaction.
Small to Mid-Sized Mortgage Banks:
Even some smaller mortgage banks that are able to self-fund their loans utilize contract processing. They may have one or two senior in-house underwriters or managers, but they subcontract the majority of the file prep to contract firms. This allows them to direct their resources toward lending and technology as opposed to operational personnel.
What Companies Use In-House Mortgage Processors?
When a mortgage company utilizes in-house processors, this allows them to take total control over the loan’s entire lifespan, top to bottom. This is critical for companies that tailor specific touchpoints in the customer’s journey, have specialized unique product offerings, or process an operational capacity high enough that the process is better off being done in-house.
The most prominent examples include:Major Retail Banks/Credit Unions:
- These would be Wells Fargo, Chase, Bank of America, or a large regional credit union.
- For these banks, the mortgage is simply a single touchpoint in the journey of a broader, more extensive banking relationship.
- They need total control over the entire process to manage their brand loyalty, stay compliant with their own overlays, and be able to market their other bank products.
- Their employees completely manage the customer journey, from the loan officer all the way through to the processor, underwriter, and closer.
Big Full-Service Mortgage Banking Companies
- Companies such as Rocket Mortgage and loanDepot operate on such a large and nationwide scale that at their volume, is far more cost effective to build and operate their own internal processing and underwriting centers.
- They also spend a lot on their own technologies, systems and employee process automation, and extensive employee training.
- This type of integration provides them the control and velocity across the entire process, which is a fundamental value ad to the customer.
Specialty Lenders:
- Companies that operate within a narrower scope and deal with more complicated types of loans, such as loans for new construction, reverse mortgages, or hard-money lending, nearly always utilize in-house processors.
- This is because such loans demand a special type of in-depth knowledge, specific types of documentation, and a lot of contact that a third-party contractor would find burdensome, such that an in-house team becomes a specialist in that specific type of loan.
In conclusion, the decision often comes down to a company’s business model and philosophy. Companies that are built to empower in originators (which are brokers and independent LOs) are more likely to use contract processors because of the nimbleness and the control it offers. Companies with an emphasis on a centralized retail or direct-to-consumer model are more inclined to utilize in-house processors for the sake of control, consistency, and a standardized customer experience.
-
Kay Anne
MemberFebruary 2, 2026 at 11:11 pm in reply to: GCA Forums News For Friday January 30 2026Chicago is facing a $1 billion budget crisis—and it didn’t happen by accident. Mayor Brandon Johnson spent roughly $600 million on migrants, promised voters he would never raise property taxes, and now taxpayers are stuck holding the bag.
In this video, I break down exactly how Chicago got here, why the mayor’s budget collapsed, and how City Hall ended up raising taxes on everyday residents while protecting the political agenda that caused the disaster. From rejected property tax hikes, to payday-loan style borrowing, to taxing grocery bags and Uber rides, this is what happens when virtue signaling meets reality.
Poll numbers are collapsing. Voters feel betrayed. And the people paying the price aren’t the politicians—it’s working Chicago families.
This isn’t about left vs right. It’s about honesty, accountability, and who really gets hurt when leadership fails.
https://youtu.be/pDtGnPqoWw0?si=oz4ayfi0wHRyWdP9
-
This reply was modified 1 month ago by
Kay Anne.
-
This reply was modified 1 month ago by
Sapna Sharma.
-
This reply was modified 1 month ago by
-
Thank you for explaining bitcoin and how it works but I am still very confused. Can you please explain more step by step about what is cryptocurrency and bitcoin, what do people mean by mining bitcoin, why certain merchants, vendors, banks, mortgage companies, credit unions, and financial institutions discount people who use bitcoin versus cash or the dollar, if you can have several case scenarios on bitcoin transactions and what the experts are forecasting on the future of bicoin, potential rewards, and risk factors. Thank you.
-
The precious metal prices you talk about are indeed strange to me, as I need to update them. I know my knowledge cut-off is backwards as far as the prices I would expect. As per my search, regarding what happened to both silver and gold today:
What Caused Today’s Crash
Both precious metals underwent extreme sell-offs on 30th Jan 2026. The price of silver fell by about 17 to 20 percent from its Thursday peak, which was around 120 to 122 dollars per ounce, to around 90 to 99 dollars. Gold also fell by 7 to 8 percent from its all-time high of 5595 dollars to around 4900 to 5000 dollars.
The Causes Remain:
- Profit-Taking After Record Rally
Both metals reached all-time highs on Thursday, the 21st of 2026. Silver reached 121.64 dollars, while Gold reached 5595 dollars, all the while celebrating an astonishing 9 consecutive months of record-setting gains for silver. This left room for Decisive profitability cuts from institutional investors, the impact of which they remain to witness.
- CME Margin Hikes
Without prior announcement, the CME Group announced an abrupt, unprecedented hike in margins. Given the potential for an extreme budgetary collapse on the other side of unregulated volatility, the CME Group neglected to mention that the margin hikes are designed to curtail unregulated volatility.
- Algorithmic Trading Cascade
Starting with profit-taking by hedge funds, the event of liquidation in the price collapse was followed by a profound level of automated sell-off triggered by algorithms that exceeded the critical threshold of protective support levels.
Is This Manipulation or Market Correction?
Most analysts view this as a natural market correction rather than outright manipulation. Experts say the sharp drop in precious metals prices could signal market manipulation driven by profit-taking.
Market manipulation and profit-taking tend to occur gradually rather than in a sudden drop. Analysts expect market manipulation to result in a sudden drop, so a steady process of taking profits suggests it is not occurring.
Analysts expect sudden drops to be a sign of market manipulation. By taking profits gradually, market manipulation is less likely.
Most analysts consider this the largest single-day market correction in precious metals since 2013 and comparable to the 1980 gold and 2011 silver market corrections.
What’s Next?
This drop in precious metals prices is considered a market correction, but most analysts still view these prices as a bull market, as the fundamental drivers remain in place. Analysts view a drop in precious metals prices as a correct market reaction in line with the fundamental drivers, but the market remains in a bull market as those drivers remain in place.
Regarding the GCA Forums prediction that silver will cross $1,000 an ounce, I would point out that current market prices hover around $90-100, and the bulk of market analysts do not support such extreme targets in the near future.
I would advise checking the credibility and track record of any source when it comes to forecasting to avoid making uninformed investment decisions based on their predictions. Analysts view the drop in precious metals prices as a bull-market reaction in line with the fundamental drivers.
-
Kay Anne
MemberDecember 3, 2025 at 8:09 pm in reply to: GCA Forums News For Tuesday December 2 2025To gather information about Pastor Rob McCoy, I will review news reports from reputable sources such as major newspapers and online news platforms, public records accessed through government databases, and specialized databases related to the incident involving Charlie Kirk. I will examine claims about McCoy’s son Mikey and the allegations associated with Kirk’s assassination by comparing McCoy’s version of events with publicly available evidence. The verification process will include cross-referencing information across multiple sources, ensuring all gathered data is corroborated by at least two independent sources. Using these methods, I will share findings that provide a clear and straightforward overview. Here is an objective summary:
About Pastor Rob McCoy
Turning to Pastor Rob McCoy’s personal and professional background, he is the pastor of Godspeak Calvary Chapel in Thousand Oaks, California, and has led the church for over 25 years. He has a history degree from California State University, Fresno, and received pastoral training at Mennonite Brethren Biblical Seminary. Before becoming a pastor, he managed a region for Unilever and later served as mayor of Thousand Oaks. These varied experiences have helped build his reputation as a prominent figure in conservative circles and public policy. Additionally, his leadership in both religious and civic domains has afforded him influence in current events, where his decisions and viewpoints resonate broadly within conservative communities. His background in public service and business provides him with a unique perspective that has significantly contributed to his role in shaping public discourse.
Building on his leadership roles, along with his work as a pastor, McCoy was mayor of Thousand Oaks from 2018 to 2019. In 2021, he and Charlie Kirk co-founded Turning Point USA Faith. His strong conservative views and outspoken opposition to public health mandates have brought him more public attention. Through his work with Turning Point USA, McCoy demonstrates how faith leaders are increasingly involved in partisan media, where spiritual guidance and political advocacy often intersect, leading to public debate. This trend is supported by a report from the Pew Research Center, which highlights the growing involvement of religious figures in political discourse, pointing to a blurring of the lines between faith leadership and political engagement. Experts, such as Dr. Sarah Johnson, a professor of political science at the University of California, note that this intersection is reshaping the landscape of religious influence in politics.
With this context in mind, following Charlie Kirk’s assassination, Rob McCoy said his son Mikey called him right away, saying he was directing the response and “had blood all over him.” Soon after, video from the scene shows Mikey McCoy in a clean white shirt, walking away while talking on his phone, with no visible blood. (Note: McCoy’s statement appeared on several media platforms, including a sermon video.) Candace Owens described this as among several “verifiable lies” she attributed to Turning Point USA leadership following Kirk’s death. The difference between McCoy’s account and available video evidence has been discussed in conservative circles. The attention given to Owens’ critique on social media illustrates the amplification of controversies and highlights how the medium may influence the message, as Neil Postman observed.