Dual-Licensed Mortgage and Real Estate Professionals Lori
Dual-Licensed Mortgage and Real Estate ProfessionalsForum Replies Created
-
Vice President Vance, speaks to reporters after a marathon day of negotiations with Iran, said no progress was made toward a peace agreement, which he added was “bad news for Iran.”
Coming amid a 14-day ceasefire in the war, Vance called the 21 hours of negotiations with the Iranian delegation, mediated by Pakistan and held in its capital Islamabad, “substantive.”
“That’s the good news,” he continued. “The bad news is that we have not reached an agreement, and I think that’s bad news for Iran much more than it’s bad news for the United States of America. So, we go back to the United States having not come to an agreement.”
Vance did not offer specifics about what offers were made or rejected, but said Iran refused to make an “affirmative commitment that they will not seek a nuclear weapon” or “seek the tools that would enable them to quickly achieve a nuclear weapon.” -
Annual compensation for mortgage processors with in-depth knowledge of obstacles involved with any of the following files: FHA, VA, USDA, Conventional, and Non-QM Loans, is estimated to be between $60,000 and $80,000. People with this type of knowledge, experience, and product background are considered “experienced to senior” levels because they are the employees most directly responsible for closing intricate, high-margin loans.
While certain general mortgage processors hover around the $50,000 mark, with many in the mid-$40,000 range, and some performers in the $60k-$70k range with increased seniority, this is not the case for all processors. Those processors who are considered “senior” and possess 5 years or more experience, along with an in-depth understanding of the required products and have an outstanding track record, will typically be found in the mid-$50,000 to high $60,000 range, and a few will be in the $70,000 range with a base salary plus bonuses. Given your processor’s capability to manage the more challenging FHA, VA, USDA, and Non-QM Loans, it is only fair to categorize them more akin to a senior or specialized processing role rather than an average retail processor.
The most commonly used payment models are straight salary, salary + bonus, and contractor-style payment. Processors are receiving salary offers in the range of 55,000 to 70,000, and possibly higher, for team leaders. The easiest to understand is a straight salary, and team leaders give a bit more. Stability is also an upside, but a team lead is unlikely to get more than a salary’s worth of work. If the company’s volume decreases, the team lead’s salary stays the same, which is a fixed cost for the company. Lastly, contractor models offer you a certain payment for each loan you close. This also means higher per-file payments. Income is, however, much more variable, which is not suited for many people but is more suited for those who are okay with a job with fluctuating pay.
For a brokerage like yours, particularly one with a blend of government and non-QM loans, the framework that typically makes the most sense is a solid base salary, per-file bonuses, and possibly straightforward volume tiers. Competitive base salaries for strong, seasoned processors would fall in the $60,000 to $70,000 range, and for a processor that is your “go-to” for difficult FHA, VA, USDA, and non-QM transactions and is pivotal to getting the pipeline closed, you could justify $75,000 to $80,000. That base salary is protective during slower months, and it is enough to retain top-quality employees.
You can add a bonus based on the number of files per closed loans. A good example of file bonuses would be a range of 100 to 150 dollars per VA/FHA/USDA/conventional file, and 150 to 250 dollars per complex loans, which would include bank statement, DSCR, or non-QM. This demonstrates to your processors that you appreciate the extra effort and shows that you understand the added time, risk, and problem-solving that goes into the more difficult files. Monthly bonuses also work. An example of this would be 500 dollars for 15 closed loans, 750 for 20, and 1,000 to 1,500 for 25 or more. This lets you set a clear target for the processor and align your costs with your revenue while remaining predictable on a per-file basis.
In a brokerage context, I would not advise providing a straight salary for someone at this level. Typically, a strong base plus per-file pay, with increased pay incentives for more complex files and volume tier options, works best. This type of structure balances the stability of income with performance motivation, protects your margins in leaner months, helps attract and retain a top-tier processor, and rewards them directly for the quantity and complexity of loans they close with you.
-
Victims of Jeffrey Epstein are implicating Trump. Could this be true?
-
Greg Bishop reviews the ongoing debate over immigration enforcement amid civil unrest. Gov. J.B. Pritzker is set to testify about migrant sanctuary policies and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson prepare for immigration enforcement and expected protests.
-
“It’s time for Jerome Powell to put on his big boy pants and say, no, inflation is not the bigger problem,” says Danielle DiMartino Booth, CEO and Chief Strategist for QI Research. In today’s interview with Daniela Cambone, Booth argues that the Fed should prioritize employment, as true inflation is low and declining—especially in housing—while job losses continue and consumer purchasing power weakens. “Companies are saying in no uncertain terms, they don’t have pricing power because U.S. consumers don’t have purchasing power.” On Trump’s tax bill, she aligns with Elon Musk, warning that it will increase the deficit and national debt. “This gravy train was supposed to end at the end of 2025… you’re not stimulating the US economy. You’re simply preventing a negative shock to the system,” she concludes.
-
New data from the National Association of Realtors show a significant decline in pending sale contracts on the U.S. Housing Market. This is the biggest drop since 2022, and a signal that the U.S. Housing Market correction is gaining steam. Mainstream news sources such as Bloomberg, Zillow, and Redfin are now all admitting the U.S. Housing Market is heading towards a correction in 2025. Listings are up and now sellers are cutting prices at the highest level in 10 years, especially in cities like Tampa, Phoenix, and Las Vegas. Home builders are also cutting prices, such as Lennar and DR Horton. These builders are leading the downturn in Sun Belt states where the inventory of homes for sale has spiked most. However, normal sellers are now also cutting prices at high rates in these states as well.
-
A trooper in Washington who’s responsible for informing the public about investigations is now the one making the news. Authorities say Sarah Clasen crashed her car into a young motorcyclist, Jhoser Sanchez, killing her. Her resistance to doing sobriety tests instantly raised red flags. Law & Crime’s Jesse Weber takes a closer look at body camera footage of Clasen’s arrest with Dan Morgan, the managing partner of personal injury law firm Morgan & Morgan.
-
Here’s Anthony Scaramucci on why Elon Musk left the White House.
Politics is not like business, he says. It’s not ruled by revenue, but by factionalism and consensus building.
And Musk is out after encountering a completely different beast than he was accustomed to as an entrepreneur.
“You’re a conductor. You’ve got an orchestra. On some days they want to play from the same sheet music, on other days they don’t want to play with each other,” Scaramucci tells me. “It’s your job to calm everyone down and get them on the same page.”
In the end, Elon’s favorability numbers flipped.
What do you think? Tell us in the comments.
-
The “One Big Beautiful Bill” is about to reshape the electric truck industry forever. With Tesla Semi production finally starting in late 2025, the timing couldn’t be worse – federal tax credits of up to $40,000 for commercial EVs could disappear by December 2025.
In this deep-dive analysis, we explore:
✅ How the bill could end EV tax credits 7 years early
✅ Tesla Semi’s production timeline vs. policy changes
✅ Real impact on fleet operators and logistics companies
✅ Winners and losers in the electric truck market
✅ What this means for companies like Volvo, Freightliner, and Nikola
The race is on: Can Tesla deliver enough Semis before incentives disappear? Will electric trucks survive without government support
00:00:00 – Introduction: Discussion about a transformative single legislation impacting the electric truck industry and Tesla’s Semi. 00:00:37 – Overview of the bill (“one big beautiful bill”), its impact on EV tax credits, and initial framing of its significance.
00:01:10 – Explanation of current EV tax credits: $7,500 for new EVs, $4,000 for used EVs, and $40,000 for commercial vehicles like Tesla Semi.
00:01:51 – Proposal within the bill to end EV tax credits earlier than planned (December 31, 2025 vs. original 2032 expiration).
00:02:28 – Discussion on Tesla’s change in position—from opposing subsidies to lobbying for them, reflecting competitive pressures. 00:03:03 – Tesla Semi production details: expected start end of 2025; volume production March 2026; facility production capacity of 50,000 units yearly.
00:03:39 – Cost advantages of electric trucks: electricity cost savings compared to diesel; potential fuel savings of $150,000 over 3 years.
00:04:15 – Volvo’s progress in electric trucks vs Tesla’s production challenges.
00:04:48 – Broader electric truck market overview including competitors like Volvo, Freightliner, Peterbilt, Nikola.
00:05:24 – Role of tax credits in bridging upfront cost barriers and enhancing business cases for fleet operators.
00:05:59 – Impact of expired incentives on different companies; advantages for established players.
00:06:35 – Large logistics companies’ electrification goals made under assumption that tax credits continue.
00:07:07 – Potential winners if the bill passes: established companies like Volvo and Tesla’s long-term prospects.
00:07:43 – Advantages Tesla holds: premium branding, autonomous tech, vertical integration, cost reduction potential.
00:08:17 – Potential losers: start-ups like Nikola, smaller fleet operators; impact on charging infrastructure and electrification pace.
00:08:52 – Explanation of the timing challenges with proposed legislation: current date June 2025, incentives ending December 31, 2025, Tesla Semi timeline, narrow window.
00:09:33 – Implications of the limited delivery window for buyers to claim tax credits and possible sales impact.
00:10:08 – Political dynamics and uncertainty surrounding the bill’s passage.
00:10:46 – Manufacturer responses: accelerating production or focusing on cost reduction strategies.
00:11:21 – Real-world business impact: example of a 50-truck regional delivery company and how incentives affect payback period.
00:12:00 – Ripple effects on dealers, charging operators, financiers due to changing economics.
00:12:35 – Less affected segments like long haul and local delivery trucking perspectives.
00:13:09 – Forecasted demand surge if bill passes, possible supply chain chaos, and alternative legislative scenarios.
00:13:43 – Possibility of bill modification or complete failure to pass, leading to different market outcomes.
00:14:21 – Industry’s strategic adaptations: Tesla’s rush to deliver, competitors adjusting, charging infrastructure investment risks.
00:14:56 – Conclusion about the bill as a pivotal test for electric truck industry viability and Tesla Semi’s critical juncture.
00:15:29 – Call for viewer engagement with questions about readiness of electric trucks without incentives.
00:16:03 – Preview of next video focusing on technologies enhancing electric truck competitiveness without subsidies.
