Realtor Susan
RealtorForum Replies Created
-
Your comments indicate dissatisfaction with U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s work and make allegations concerning investigations of some persons and events. The comments also put her effectiveness, loyalty to the administration, and whether she should continue in that role into doubt. I offer a systematic approach to respond to your concerns while focusing on facts, avoiding unproven information, and speculation. In the absence of specific allegations, I note when evidence is lacking. Given the scope of your issues, I will address them individually as separate topics and cite relevant resources to address the analysis while keeping the debate objective.
1. Performance of Pam Bondi as U.S. Attorney General
– Missing Actions: Bondi has been silent and has done nothing until now, claiming that she is paying attention to her Fox News programs guise, and is losing respect among Trump’s allies:
– Responding to Inaction: Pam Bondi took some action towards resolving the issues by issuing 14 first-day directives on February 5, 2025. These were:
– Creating a “weaponization working group”
Bondi created “weaponization working groups” that reviewed the exercise of Smith’s prosecutorial discretion in prosecuting Trump (regarding January 6 and classified documents).
Bondi also hindered an FBI blocking action against the foreign influence campaign by China, Russia, and others… due to unfriendly political targeting of Republicans…saying the conservatives, Republicans have no legitimate interest in protecting them?
I am taking charge of reviewing some of this and making money. I am also permitting the use of “improper investigative tactics” in the January 6 prosecutions while permitting investigative processes to contemplate unforgiving feelings.
It does require a claim, and I am allowed to dismiss the lack.
– Advocated for immigration enforcement during the illegal immigration advocacy, the Trump crackdown.
– Lifting the moratorium on federal executions and seeking new ways to expand the use of the death penalty.
– Dismissed four DEI lawsuits against the police and fire departments and created an anti-antisemitism task force.
-Public Sentiment: Sentiment on social media platform X seems mixed. Some users appreciate @Cernovich and @mrddmia praising Bondi for removing politicized DOJ officials. Other users, like @FeistyLibLady and @GioBruno1600, criticize her inaction and apparent defense of Trump’s supporters. Emerging debates seem rational but convey a false sense of impartiality, accompanied by the absence of hard proof showcasing her effectiveness.
Social Media: No X posts support the notion that Bondi is constantly on Fox News discussing current affairs. A March 2, 2025, post alleges she made eight appearances, which cannot be contextualized and remain unsupported.
Bondi’s Beginnings: Bondi’s bio notes 18 years of prosecuting and attending law school in Florida. She most recently served as the Florida Attorney General from 2011 to 2019. While core Trump loyalists endorse her conduct, hesitancy stems from criticisms regarding her fierce independence and asserting enduring loyalty to Trump during his presidency, between impeachment and election-supporting election fraud antics.
Incompetence or Deep State Allegations: No proof has emerged suggesting Bondi is part of the “deep state,” a secret partisan Democratic coalition, or a plant. Her actions, such as overseeing Trump’s prosecutions and stopping the FBI’s attempts to manage foreign influence, actually support Trump’s agenda, exclaiming loyalty.
Interpretation: In Bondi’s case, she has made operational changes to the department since her appointment, specifically concerning the alignment of the DOJ with Trump’s ambitions, especially with immigration, Epstein, and January 6 document reviews. Accusations of her not doing anything seem to be an overreach. Although her concentration on Trump’s directives has been criticized as excessively partisan, there are striking gaps this administration has tried to fill with incremental change, which voters may perceive as stagnation. BOJ functions like investigations or the legal scrutiny involved take a long time, even though the expectations may be relatively acute. No such evidence exists for personal character statements or unsupported myths of her being an aide to the Democratic camp.
2. Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)
Assertion: Elon Musk and his one hundred thousand employees working for DOGE have exposed fraud within dozens of government agencies.
Response:
DOGE Overview: The Department of Government Efficiency is a loosely organized advisory group spearheaded by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy. It is intended to decrease spending and bureaucracy at the federal level. It does not possess a confirmed staff number of over 100,000, as this figure is bloated, statistically speaking, without any official documents verifying such a workforce.
Fraud Allegations: As of April 24, 2025, no Musk or DOGE verified claims detailing “fraud among dozens of government agencies.” An X post mentions DOGE litigation, but this is also vague and unsubstantiated. While Musk has been vocally critical of government inefficiency (e.g., on X), there is no single source where an all-encompassing DOGE report on fraud exists.
Context: DOGE concentrates on reducing regulations and expenditures; the same is not true for criminal investigations, which are under the jurisdiction of the DOJ. Any uncovering of fraud would be referred to Bondi’s DOJ, but no such documented referral cases exist.
Analysis: The lack of evidence corroborating DOGE’s uncovered large-scale fraud is of the utmost concern. Musk is limited to an advisory role, while criminal fraud is the domain of the DOJ. Perhaps misinterpretation of anticipated strikingly aggressive action by DOGE tends to suggest fraud unveiling would happen at the drop of a hat, which misunderstands its mandate.
**3. Investigation of Hunter Biden for Fraud**
**Claim: What is the current state of the Hunter Biden fraud investigation?**
**Response:**
Background:** As of 2024, Hunter Biden is convicted of felonies in tax and gun offenses stemming from the prosecution of a special counsel within the Biden DOJ. President Joe Biden granted a pardon to Hunter Biden in December 2024.
– **Fraud Allegations:** Several Republicans, including Trump associates, have claimed Hunter Biden worked with China and Ukraine and violated FARA by not registering as a foreign lobbyist. His lawyers argued that he did not lobby for foreign interests. Hence, no FARA charges were filed.
– **Current Status:** There appears to be no substantiating evidence suggesting that the DOJ under Bondi is actively investigating Hunter Biden for fraud as of April 24, 2025. Her “weaponization working group” is fixated on Jack Smith’s Trump cases, rather than Biden probes. Public commentary on X, for instance, Mitchell Vii, suggests that people are tired of no action being taken, yet this lack of evidence denotes a lack of evidence.
**Analysis:** It is reasonable to speculate that the pardon closed avenues for additional prosecution sans fresh evidence. Trump’s DOJ priorities do not include Hunter Biden’s prosecution, although public demand from some Trump supporters suggests otherwise.
4. Anthony Fauci and The Coronavirus Vaccine Scandal
Claim: As of April 2025, Anthony Fauci is under investigation for committing crimes against humanity for allegedly using the coronavirus vaccine as a weapon of mass destruction.
Response: – Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has received a concerted amount of criticism from conservatives, particularly around issues regarding vaccine advocacy; this has been used repeatedly to bring down Dr. Anthony Fauci, the former NIAID head. The allegations of “vaccine crimes against humanity” absurdly and purely stem from conspiracy theories rather than any credible legal documents.
– Investigation Status: Citing the lack of any allegations from the DOJ’s Fauci claiming he has “crimes against humanity,” credible Jesus V. Twitter evidence suggests the absence of investigative claims documented on March 15th, 2025, on Fauci. Neither Bondi’s orders mention corresponding vaccine probes nor implicate vaccine conspiracy theories for no reason.
Context: Imbalanced bail disinformation, Fuentes also documents DiLorenzo embodying these as common on the fly without a cry, promoted by radicalized, unrestrained platforms. But there isn’t a single court document, Department of Justice announcement foundation, or even a rational news publication. Citing examples of demonization and persecution, he has openly testified before American assembly sessions alongside Testimony afterwards, 2024, quote unquote congress while not facing endpoint and approximation termed official criminal indictment.
Based on Analysis: Bond’s aforementioned probing investigation focuses aimlessly plunging into unexplained Epstein absurd fixation, emphasis also on unpredictable im sob bums aimlessly looking nowhere focus extremely fuzzy compass homing aim for immigration needs warrants for speculation need warrantless traceable routed intelligence concealed blasting brainstormed devoid crafted buzz tracing speculative appealing funnel appealing guided constructing blending blurring imposing overwhelming disinformation propagandied crafted barrier blurred visibility camouflaged routed exploding campaign arbitrary layered multiple numerous blanketed for disguise needs gridless focus.
5. FBI Trump Framing Agent Allegation Marked Lover
Claim: Defrauder FBI agent lovers attempted to frame Trump
Response:
Context: This is most likely former FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page, whose anti-Trump text messages during work hours fueled the claims of bias during the Trump-Russia investigation. Strzok was let go in 2018, and Page resigned in 2018.
Investigative Status: No current investigation against Strzok or Page was reported under Bondi. Her “weaponization working group” focuses on probes of Jack Smith and does not concern the FBI’s actions in 2016. Previous investigations, including reports by the DOJ Inspector General, uncovered no facts showing either Strzok’s or Page’s bias that might have compromised the President Trump-Russia probe operations.
Public Sentiment: Ever since 2018, trump supporters continue asserting “framing” on X with no new evidence or legal endeavors surfacing
Analysis: Bondi’s DOJ has opted to target matters involving Trump instead. The “FBI lovers” narrative remains a stale accusation stripped of development.
6. Collusion of the Russia Hoax
Claim: What’s happening with the Russia Collusion Hoax?
Response:
– Background: The phrase “Russian collusion hoax” is what Trump used to describe the Special Counsel Robert Mueller investigation concerning the 2016 election interference. The 2019 report of Mueller documented the fact that Russia did unauthorised interference, but did not provide enough evidence to accuse Trump’s campaign of conspiracy.
Bondi’s Actions: Bondi canceled an FBI foreign influence task force’s ‘Russia investigation’ disinformation campaign efforts (2017) because she believed it disproportionately focused on Republicans.
Current Status: It does not appear that the DOJ has an active investigation into any aspects of the Mueller probe or its investigators ( the Trump ‘hoax’ claims). Bondi is focused on the Trump prosecutions rather than looking back at 2016.
Analysis: The ‘hoax’ claims are more political than legal. Bondi’s elimination of that task force does not line up with the Republican view of Russia’s interference. Still, it does not mark the beginning of any new investigations into Mueller’s work.
7 January 6 Conspiracy
Claim: What is happening with the January 6 conspiracy?
Response:
Bondi’s Actions: Bondi has taken steps to review the January 6 prosecutions for using “improper investigative techniques” and “unethical prosecutions.” Her DOJ also subpoenaed FBI employee rosters for these cases, raising the risk of their limbs being lopped off.
Conspiracy Claims: There is no factual basis for the claim that there was a ‘conspiracy’ behind the January 6 prosecutions. Bondi’s review is looking into the DOJ’s alleged excesses, not a conspiracy in which the Democrats are pulling every string.
Analysis: Bondi’s assessment coincides with Trump’s perception of a weaponized DOJ using its authority against political opponents. Additionally, no evidence supports claims of a “conspiracy,” and the arguments presented remain simply rhetorical.
8. Allegations of Fraud During the 2020 Elections
Claim: Answer the inquiry regarding the 2020 election fraud.
Response:
– Background: Trump, along with his allies, including Bondi, specifically targeted Pennsylvania to claim that election fraud took place in the 2020 elections. The courts have rejected such claims, and no evidence of fraud has surfaced.
– Bondi’s Position: For Biden’s confirmation hearing, Bondi did not answer regarding Biden winning decisively in 2020 because she raised “issues” around Pennsylvania, yet granted that Biden is President.
Current Status: Under Bondi, no investigation division is conducting a probe into the 2020 election, and she considers fraud a matter of dispute. Her priority is to evaluate Trump’s actions, not 2020’s.
Analysis: The fraud claims made about the election have neither been substantiated with evidence nor investigated by the Department of Justice. Bondi’s reluctance during hearings denotes loyalty to Trump, without directly suggesting that investigations were undertaken.
9. Barack Obama Birth Certificate Fraud
Claim: Fraud perpetrated by Barack Obama and his Birth certificate.
Response:
– Background: The birther conspiracy, which Oz called birthis, is a reputed damage perpetrated by Trump that blamed Obama for lying about his citizenship. His presidency was validated in 2011 when Hawaii officials endorsed the long-form birth certificate.
Current Status: No investigation into Obama’s birth certificate was officially lodged under Bondi or any previous AG. This has been repeatedly debunked and lacks justification in court law.
Analysis: This is a baseless conspiracy theory with no supporting claim or investigation. Bondi’s DOJ has no active inquiry into this.
10. Adam Schiff and California Democrats’ Fraud
Claim: Fraud perpetrated by Adam Schiff and California Democrats defrauded.
Response:
– Background: Schiff, a senator from California, has faced particular ire from Trump for his participation in the January 6 committee and Trump’s impeachment proceedings. No details of specific fraud allegations are contained in your inquiry.
Investigation Status: Bondi did not issue any statements about prosecutorial inquiries into Schiff or the California Democrats regarding fraudulent activities from the DOJ. So far, no investigations have been opened. Bondi admitted in her hearing that she had not talked to Trump about prosecuting Schiff.
– Context: Schiff issued sharply toned questions to Bondi and heavily partnered with her in questioning loyalty to the courts during the confirmation hearing.
Analysis: Claims are bare boned and wrapped in a mist under unsupported evidence.
11. Mass Deportation and Lawsuits Against Illegal Migrants
Claim: What are the reasons behind the lack of mass deportation and lawsuits about illegal migrants?
Response:
– Bondi’s Role: Bondi directed the DOJ to enforce Trump’s immigration policy by initiating a “crackdown” using “all available criminal statutes” to assist DHS. She serves as custodian of policy defenses in the court regarding immigration and supervises the courts.
Status: Plans for mass deportation are still only conceptual; there are logistical and legal uncertainties (i.e., backlog in courts, international coordination). Department of Justice announcements fail to specify plans for lawsuits against “illegal migrants.” Inaction may be caused by operational hurdles, not Bondi’s supposed lack of action.
Progress: Immigration enforcement remains a priority within Bondi’s DOJ, although large-scale deportations necessitate inter-departmental alignment beyond the DOJ (e.g., ICE and DHS).
Analysis: Action has been taken toward deportation, but it is highly complicated. With Bondi’s directives, one could say there is activity, but the expectation for blindingly swift results is likely unrealistic.
12. Human Trafficking, Epstein, Gates, and “Crime Families”
Claims: The spread of child solicitation and human trafficking by Epstein, crimes of depopulation by Gates, and corruption of the Clinton, Biden, Obama “Crime Families”, Schiff, and Pelosi.
Response:
-As Human Trafficking: Before Bondi was AG of Florida, she advocated for stronger laws against the crime. Her office has made human smuggling arrests, yet there isn’t any evidence of a “national epidemic” investigation.
– Jeffrey Epstein: Bondi announced an inquiry into the Epstein documents that may go as far as client lists at Trump’s instructions. This has been criticized as part of a politically motivated witch hunt aimed at Democrats like Bill Clinton without proof of wrongdoing.
– Bill Gates’ Depopulation: “Crimes against humanity” as accused by Gates do not have an investigation or evidence by the DOJ. Their legal conjectures are devoid of any legal foundation.
– Clinton/Biden/Obama Crime Families: No investigations are reported by the DOJ as these people are not labeled “crime families.”
Schiff and Pelosi: There are no documented investigations into the fraud or corruption involved with Schiff, while Nancy/Paul Pelosi’s are recorded.
Analysis: Balancing the claims, Bondi’s Epstein review efforts continue while the other claims, like Gates or “crime families,” are known to be unsubstantiated, lack evidence, and are not priorities for the DOJ. The human trafficking cases are ongoing, but there is no confirmation of the investigation being on an epidemic scale.
13. Calls For Arrests, Indictments, And Replacing Bondi With Matt Gaetz.
Claims: Bondi should be fired, with Matt Gaetz taking her position and immediately starting the process of politically motivated arrests and indictments of corrupt politicians.
Response:
Arrests and Indictments: President Trump’s DOJ has produced arrests in terrorism, with smuggling and trafficking taking the lead. However, under the high-profile political arrests set forth, none have come to fruition. The legal prerequisites of indictments are burdensome and protracted, which may be the reason behind the inaction against those named suspects like Schiff and Clinton.
-
FAQs on the Real Estate and Mortgage Markets for Thursday April 23rd, 2025
-
Great opportunity for real estate agents to double or increase their incomes substantially. How does Nexa Mortgage dually licensed realtor and mlo BDM program work?
https://non-qmmortgagelenders.com/mlo-career-opportunity-for-realtors/
non-qmmortgagelenders.com
MLO Career Opportunity For Realtors
Non-QM Mortgage Brokers, Inc. offers MLO Career Opportunity For Realtors where full time real estate agents can make dual commissions
-
The following are the most common queries regarding a real estate agent getting a dual designation as a realtor and mortgage loan originator (MLO) business development manager (BDM):
1. **What is the foremost advantage of being a dually licensed real estate agent and MLO?**
– The ability to receive commissions on both the real estate transaction and the mortgage loan origination is the primary advantage; this greatly increases your earning potential.
2. **Do I need to be an actively practicing real estate agent to engage in this program?**
– Yes, to participate in the dually licensed program, you must be a real estate agent in active status.
3. **What are the steps I need to take in obtaining an NMLS license?**
– To attain NMLS licensure, one must fulfill the prerequisites for education, complete the national exam alongside a state-specific one, undergo a background check, and submit their payment. These are general guidelines, as specific criteria differ amongst states.
4. **Am I able to select my partnering loan officer?**
– Generally, yes. As a dually licensed real estate agent, you are given the discretion to select the NMLS-licensed loan officer that you wish to partner with.
5. **How does the payment plan work?**
– You will receive your standard commission from selling the property, alongside a commission for originating a mortgage loan. The specifics are open to negotiation with your partner loan officer and the mortgage lender.
6. **What are the additional responsibilities for license renewals under the NMLS?**
– To retain the NMLS license, you will have to complete continuing education instruction. Their determination and renewal deadlines differ by state.
7. **Is there a defined time allocation needed for the mortgage origination process?**
– Time allocation varies, but in most cases, the loan officer will complete the majority of the work needed for mortgage origination. Your responsibilities will include client referrals and dealing with the loan officer.
8. **If I prefer a certain partner, can I still use other loan officers?**
– Generally, yes. However, it differs based on the agreements and stipulations of the mortgage lenders you partner with.
9. **What assistance can I receive from my mortgage lender?**
– With respect to your marketing accounts, your mortgage lenders may offer assistance in the form of training, marketing materials, and help you initiate the origination of mortgage loans. Different lenders offer varying degrees of assistance.
10. **Could there be some regulatory matters that I may have to consider?**
– Yes, you need to observe all applicable state and federal rules concerning real estate and mortgage activities. This includes compliance with the code of ethics, obligations of disclosure, and measures to prevent fraud.
11. **Who else benefits from the program besides the participants?**
– A homebuyer enjoys a client-centered approach to servicing because his real estate and financing needs are handled simultaneously by a team, thus providing value and efficient service.
12. **If I am licensed in several states, can I still participate in this program?**
– You only need to hold an NMLS license from one state to be part of the program. For those who are licensed in several states, you have the option of broadening your services; however, you will have to meet the licensing regulations of every state.
13. **What happens if I decide to leave the program or change my partner loan officer?**
– The answer is dependent upon the agreements made with the partner loan officer and the mortgage lender. Typically, you have the option to withdraw and even change partners, but there are certain steps, terms, and agreements that must be adhered to.
14. **Are there any additional costs associated with becoming a dually licensed real estate agent and MLO?**
– Yes, there are some costs associated with acquiring the NMLS license, which include the pre-licensing education, exam fee, background check fee, and continuing education. There may also be costs associated with partnering with a mortgage lender and some of his marketing operational works.
15. **How can I get started with the dually licensed program?**
– For these steps, one must look for the requirements of acquiring an NMLS license in the specified state, procure a reputable mortgage lender that offers the BDM program, and then complete the required steps as prescribed. It is also prudent to seek guidance from professionals already in practice.
-
Can you please give our viewers and members of GCA Forums News a comprehensive, detailed overview of the separation, process, and consequences of the differences of criminal versus civil investigations and audits from the Internal Revenue Service?
-
What new regulations are currently under consideration?
-
Can you elaborate on the recent real estate fraud investigations?
-
Privatize government agencies. I am not a fortune teller, but in my opinion, having President Donald Trump as our president is a Godsend. You need to run the government like a business. Basic Business 101 applies to any organization. I can show you example after example. Why is the United States Post Office nearly bankrupt and private courier companies like Federal Express and United Parcel Service showing profitability and earnings growth quarter after quarter, year after year? What President Donald Trump is doing and the changes he is making are that he is thinking like a smart, shrewd businessman. Another case scenario: Let’s say Illinois collects 7.0% sales tax. Say there is EARL’S CHEVROLET DEALER in Chicago. Normally, there is a 3% margin on new cars. So, Earl’s Chevrolet makes 3% profit on every new car they sell and has to pay 7.0% sales tax to the state of Illinois. Therefore, the state earns 7% for each new car sold in the state, and Earl’s Chevrolet makes 3%. Earl Chevrolet is profitable since they know how to live within their means, meticulously watch their profit and loss, and monitor their expenses. However, the state of Illinois is always broke because they do not care about their profitability. Just raise taxes. From the governor of the state on down, nobody loses sleep at night if their books turn into the red territory. NOT THEIR MONEY. Just increase taxes. The state of Illinois is broke and will always be broke. No matter how high their state taxes are, it is not their money. Politicians take care of their special interest groups, such as the police, fire, and teacher’s union and its retirement fund. Illinois pensions for police, fire, and teachers are broke and operating in the red. Pretty soon they will run out of money. Not only does everything the state touches turn to shit, but the state of Illinois and the city of Chicago are in big trouble because they blew millions of dollars, if not billions, in harboring illegal immigrants. Yes, folks, these brainless, incompetent, fraudster politicians spent taxpayer hard-earned money to harbor illegal immigrants without the approval of their constituents. If you correlate how states are managed by politicians and the changes President Donald Trump is making to make America Great Again, government needs to get privatized and run like a business. This is a developing story from GCA FORUMS DAILY HEADLINE NEWS, and we will update you as the story get’s updated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wYHRWo2Ins
-
This reply was modified 3 months, 3 weeks ago by
Gustan Cho.
-
This reply was modified 3 months, 2 weeks ago by
Sapna Sharma.
-
This reply was modified 3 months, 3 weeks ago by
-
Excellent, informative advice, Dejon. What you are saying makes all the sense in the world. I think it is best that JD does not breed Chloe and get another potential mom as the German Shepherd mother for his litter of puppies.