[Connie]

What has Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard discovered that all eyes are on Former President Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Podesta, John Brennan, Former FBI Director James Comey, Former President Joe Biden, James Clapper, Former FBI Agent Peter Strzok, Justice Department Attorney Lisa Paige, and high-level intelligence people in the Obama Administration? There is strong evidence Barack Obama was the ringleader of this treasonous act of evil.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtXfAX2dTQI

[Dawn]

Overview: Tulsi Gabbard’s Exposé as DNI

Tulsi Gabbard, the sitting Director of National Intelligence, has recently leaked explosive claims about senior figures from the Obama era. She names Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Podesta, John Brennan, James Comey, Joe Biden, James Clapper, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, and others. According to Gabbard, she possesses “overwhelming evidence” proving a treasonous conspiracy to sabotage Trump’s presidency. Her declarations have triggered furious political fireworks and been dragged under the media’s and citizen watchdogs’ microscope.

The Core ClaimsFabricated and Weaponized Intelligence

Gabbard contends that immediately after Trump’s 2016 win, Obama’s national security circle devised and politicized intelligence to show that Russia “interfered” to boost Trump. She charges that raw intelligence was distorted to forge a narrative that would justify launching the long-running “Russia collusion” probe, paving the way for the “years-long coup” she says the Trump presidency endured.

Key Officials Named and Their Alleged Roles

DNI Gabbard and released records, name or tie these people to the claims:

• Barack Obama is said to have led the entire effort by ordering that intelligence be bent to suit the goals.
• Hillary Clinton and John Podesta are said to have green-lighted plans that linked Trump’s campaign to Russian hacking to be used as a campaign weapon against him.
• John Brennan, James Clapper, and James Comey are accused of briefing and coordinating the intelligence steps that set off the Trump–Russia investigation.
• Joe Biden, Loretta Lynch, and Susan Rice are said to have met to discuss a strategy for advancing the Russia intelligence narrative after the election.
• Peter Strzok and Lisa Page ran the Crossfire Hurricane investigation and are said to have done the counterintelligence work.
• John Podesta appears again as the Clinton campaign chair, mentioned in internal strategy talks.

Alleged “Evidence”

Gabbard’s office released and declassified these documents:

• Internal emails and notes from meetings held in late 2016.
• Key points that, by December 2016, foreign adversaries had not changed the vote through cyber means.
• Briefings that mention a Clinton campaign idea to “smear Donald Trump by embedding a scandal over Russian interference.”
• Correspondence indicates that U.S. intelligence agencies were mainly worried about specific Russian cyber intrusions before the election.
• The agencies found the Russian efforts focused more on spreading false stories than changing voting results.

The Broader Reaction & Fact-Checking

Lack of Independent Corroboration

• Previous Investigations: Several bipartisan probes—led by the Senate Intelligence Committee and the Justice Department—have confirmed that Russia sought to sway the 2016 election in Trump’s favor.
• None, however, found that President Obama, Secretary Clinton, or any other senior official invented the intelligence or plotted a coup.
• Media and Nonpartisan Analysis: Major news organizations and fact-checkers have labeled Gabbard’s claims as “misleading” and “politically driven” and have said they lack solid proof.
• Analysts point out that Gabbard’s newly disclosed documents fail to counter the intelligence community’s core finding.
• Russian interference occurred, but there is no evidence that votes were altered or that Obama directly tampered with the results.

Response from Former Officials and Critics

• Former President Obama’s Office: A spokesperson for Obama labeled the allegations “outrageous,” “absurd,” and “a distraction” from the well-documented evidence.
• The office maintains that the documents Gabbard released do not weaken the established record on Russian interference.
• Democratic Lawmakers and Analysts: Senior Democratic members of Congress and intelligence veterans have called Gabbard’s accusations “baseless” and “full of errors,” stressing that they blend distinct subjects and disregard years of thorough inquiries.

Context: What Do the Documents Say?

The released records show that intelligence officials were worried about Russian disinformation campaigns before and after the election. Several papers capture agency-level discussions over how to portray the interference. However, they fail to reveal any instruction from Barack Obama or his top aides to distort or fabricate intelligence in a treasonous arrangement.

The intelligence community’s core finding has not changed:

• Russia ran a coordinated effort to shape opinions and create social fractures, mainly through social media and hacking.
• Still, it did not rig votes or change election outcomes.

Legal and Investigative Status

• Criminal Referrals: Gabbard has filed her findings with the Department of Justice, but to date, there have been no formal indictments, prosecutions, or new criminal charges aimed at any former officials from the Obama administration related to her claims.
• Ongoing Investigations: Reports confirm that inquiries into the actions of certain officials during the Trump-Russia inquiry are still active.
• Especially into John Brennan and James Comey, no verifiable, specific “treasonous” conduct has yet been demonstrated.

Even with bold statements from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and heavy media attention, the claim that Barack Obama led a treasonous coup is still up for serious debate. No independent, bipartisan, or nonpartisan investigation has confirmed it. The latest documents shed light on governmental discussions but stop short of proving any planned, treasonous conspiracy led by Obama or his closest advisers. Trusted analysts continue to stand by the original U.S. intelligence conclusion that Russia pursued efforts to sway the 2016 election. So far, accusations of outright treason against Obama-era officials have not been backed by concrete evidence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDilGG-xEgs