-
Is Kamala Harris That Much of an Idiot?
-
Kamala Harris is, hands down, the biggest global idiot. An excerpt from Kamala Harris’ memoir, 107 Days, reveals tensions with Biden’s aides before his 2024 withdrawal. Harris says they saw her success as a threat and offered little support. Biden dropped out after a poor debate, endorsed Harris, and she raised millions, but lost to Donald Trump in the general election.
-
Kamala Harris is the most incompetent politician in the world. What is it about her that people like? She is an unlikeable person, and her word salad techniques are among the dumbest things anyone can do. What has she ever accomplished in life? Absolutely nothing.
-
Kamala Harris has been a divisive figure in American history. Most people do not like her, but there are many things for which people might support her, and there might be people who do like her.
For the first time, a female, and for the first time in history, an African-American and an Asian-American vice president of the United States of America was Harris. This milestone achievement sticks with many people, who view her as successful because she marks history and provides much hope for a new change and representation. Her senator, prosecutor, and attorney general record satisfies her supporters with her experience and credibility.
Those who support her especially appreciate that she advocates for social justice issues. In her capacity as an attorney general and a district attorney, she spoke against and of death, as well as transgender rights cases, in addition to advocating for the LGBTQ+ community, and much more. She continues to earn her support, especially from the progressive and minority segments of the population.
During her presidential campaign, Harris focused on immigration reform, healthcare reform, and environmental protection. These people support her, especially because they care about her position on these issues.
Harris has displayed certain resilience traits and a willingness to question the status quo. She has sparked public engagement with increasing discussions about her vision for the country, not to mention the campaign that almost 12X engineered her removal after the publication of her memoir,107 Days, and the subsequent promotional tour for her book. That, along with her willingness to interact with the public, has earned her a reputation for being truthful and focused.
Harris’s critics notwithstanding, she is still a vital member of the Democrats, and her supporters consider her remarkable potential for the next phase of a higher office. She can connect with her followers. She has ascended to the class due to her leadership, considering the wide-ranging and multiple differences.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3bFr97qfqY
-
This reply was modified 7 months, 1 week ago by
Gustan Cho.
-
This reply was modified 7 months, 1 week ago by
-
Kamala Harris’s candidacy for president in 2024 was surrounded by one of the most intense periods in American politics. After the much-criticized June debate performance, Biden was under intense pressure to withdraw. He withdrew on July 21, 2024, and to the surprise of many, he started to support Harris for president. Immediately after, he was steamrolled by the Democratic candidate for president. To offset Tim Monroe, Harris raised over 100 million in funds after the server issue and won the election alongside Donald Trump’s campaign, the struggle to win over working-class voters, and the remaining skepticism within segments of the Democratic party base—Harris’s hardly a deciding factor in her loss. Even with the positive moments and a solid debate, for instance, strong fundraising shows, she lost Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, all of which are key battleground states. Most post-election analyses have centered on her struggle to differentiate her campaign from Biden’s and the need to navigate party conflicts.
Harris’s memoir suggests a feeling of being near the campaign and becoming ‘sprinted’ without noticing that she didn’t have time to reach the electorate. She describes the ‘disappointments’ surrounding the ‘White House in the final moments of that leg of the campaign. Despite her unwillingness to make the 2028 prediction, she is working on other things for now.
This chapter is the latest episode in the history of American politics and the centre of controversies that political analysts do not tire of discussing. Biden’s later exit, along with the infighting in the party, heads the list for many, while others focus on the strong current of support the Trump campaign was benefiting from and the general feeling of the nation toward politics in 2024.
-
I do believe that Kamala Harris is one of the most incomptetent polictians in U.S. history. Cannot believe she spent $1.5 BILLION on her 2024 Presidential Campaign and lost by a landslide. Can you please tell us what she is doing now? What is her plan? Did she really think she was up to running the United States with her low intelligence and competence? Is Kamala Harris thinking about running for President in 2028? Who else in both the Democrat and Republican side planning on running for President in 2028? I heard JB Pritzker, Gavin Newsom, JD Vance, Ron DeSantis, Marco Rubio, Kristi Noem, Eric Swawell, and others. Who do you think the MidTerms will go to?
-
Kamala Harris’s 2024 campaign and her supporters raised more than $1 billion after the election, according to AP. Her team called the 107-day race fast-paced and full of tough challenges.
Recent reports confirm that Kamala Harris will not run for California governor in 2026, but she has not ruled out a presidential run in 2028. In July 2025, Reuters reported that Harris decided against running for governor and left the door open to a 2028 campaign. AP reported that Harris said she is not finished, has not made a decision about 2028, and still sees herself as a party leader supporting Democrats. She does not have an official campaign but remains active in Democratic politics, helping with the 2026 elections and keeping her 2028 options open. She has not officially announced her candidacy. According to AP, Harris said another White House run could include her, but no final decision has been made. The top Democratic candidates for 2028 include Gavin Newsom, JB Pritzker, and Wes Moore, who have all raised their national profiles during the Trump years. Harris is still an important figure in these discussions since she has not ruled out running. AP also recently mentioned Elissa Slotkin as a possible 2028 candidate, noting her work in Iowa and other key states.
On the Republican side, JD Vance and Marco Rubio are the main candidates right now. In February, Reuters reported that Trump had not chosen a favorite to succeed him in 2028. In March, Reuters reported that Vance won the CPAC 2028 straw poll with 53 percent, while Rubio received 35 percent. Reuters also reported that Vance planned to talk with Trump about a possible run after the midterm elections. For the Democrats, JB Pritzker is seen as a serious candidate, with Reuters listing him among governors preparing for 2028. In late 2025, Reuters said Pritzker was considering a run, while Gavin Newsom is also a strong possibility and will decide after the 2026 midterms.
Ron DeSantis is still a possible 2028 contender, but recent reports from Reuters and AP have shifted attention to Vance and Rubio. Marco Rubio is now seen as one of the top Republican candidates.
Kristi Noem’s popularity has dropped significantly since Trump removed her as DHS secretary in March 2026, according to Reuters and AP, hurting her national reputation. AP reports that Eric Swalwell is now focusing on the California governor’s race and is stepping back from national politics for 2028. Democrats are expected to do better in the House, while Republicans are likely to keep control of the Senate. With Trump’s approval ratings falling, Democrats are working harder to take back Congress. AP points out Republican weaknesses related to Iran, but Sabato’s Crystal Ball warns that party control could still change, especially in the House, since the GOP has an advantage in the Senate. The Senate currently has a small Republican lead, but things could still change. Even though Trump’s popularity is falling, Reuters notes that Democrats have not gained much momentum, so a big wave election is unlikely. In summary, Harris still has influence but has not become the clear Democratic front-runner. The field is crowded, with Newsom, Pritzker, Wes Moore, and possibly Slotkin in the mix. On the Republican side, Reuters highlights Vance and Rubio as early favorites. As the midterms get closer, Democrats seem stronger in the House, while Republicans have the advantage in the Senate.n the Senate.
-
-
In my honest opinion, I think Kamala Harris is the World’s dumbest politician with absolutely zero accomplishments and very high ambitions that she will never be able to master. Kamala Harris never had a job in the private sector, never had a managerial role in a business, does not know how to run a business, and has slept with horney old men to get ahead in politics. Harris does not have any sense of humor, is not liked, and most Americans are really surprised and are shaking their heads on how she got elected the District Attorney of San Francisco, California Attorney General, United States Senator for California, and Vice President of The United States of America. Can you please tell us more about Kamala Harris, the most incompetent politician and very unliked person with a single digit IQ and extremely high dreams? What are her political ambitions? How can she spend $1.5 billion dollars on her 2024 presidential election and not win a single state?
-
Kamala Harris, whose full name is Kamala Devi Harris, is an experienced prosecutor from California. She ran as the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate in 2024 but lost to Donald Trump. Most of her career has been in public prosecution and government roles. She has not worked in the private sector or held management positions outside government.
Background and Rise in Politics
Kamala Harris was born in Oakland in 1964 to Donald Harris, a Jamaican economics professor, and Shyamala Gopalan, an Indian breast cancer researcher. After her parents divorced when she was seven, her mother raised her in the Bay Area before moving to Montreal. Harris earned a degree in Political Science and Economics from Howard University in 1986 and a law degree from UC Hastings in 1989.
Kamala Harris Career In Government and Law Enforcement
Throughout her career, Harris has focused on government and law enforcement. She served as a Deputy District Attorney in Alameda County from 1990 to 1998, then worked as a prosecutor in the San Francisco District Attorney’s Office from 1998 to 2003.
- In 2010, Harris made history as California’s first female, first African American, and first South Asian American Attorney General.
- She was re-elected in 2014 and continued in the role.
- After serving as Attorney General for four years, Harris was elected as California’s U.S. Senator in 2016.
- After winning the 2020 elections, Harris became the first African American woman to serve as Vice President, after being chosen as Joe Biden’s running mate and winning the election. leap into politics as a prosecutor in the mid-level Democratic stronghold of California’s San Francisco.
- Because of her law enforcement credentials, she was favored in the elections under the California Democratic political landscape at the time.
Harris has spent her entire career in public prosecution and elected positions, without experience in the private sector as a business professional. She was the California assembly member and the San Francisco mayor, and Kamala Harris was in a romantic relationship for a year.
Because of the relationship and despite the huge age gap, she was appointed to a few commissions, which provided her with her first major public-sector roles in California and later served as her launching pad.
He admits even that small role in her career. She has said no to him for anything and distanced herself during her public roles. She was temporarily dating a grandfather, and this was part of a political marriage to multiply ‘old creepy men’, all of which was before her elections.
Record in Office: Accomplishments and Criticisms
Harris has faced significant scrutiny during her time in office, with critics from various backgrounds sharing their opinions on her work as a prosecutor. Below is an outline of her notable achievements.
- As San Francisco District Attorney from 2004 to 2011, Harris created a rehabilitation program for first-time non-violent offenders, established a unit to prosecute environmental hate crimes, and started a program to reduce truancy.
- She also cleared homicide case backlogs and ended the use of the death penalty. Some critics argued that her truancy policies were too strict.
- As California Attorney General from 2011 to 2017, Harris secured a multi-billion-dollar settlement from mortgage lenders to protect homeowners’ rights.
- Her office advanced progressive changes in privacy and technology laws and expanded reentry programs.
- However, she faced criticism for initially opposing marijuana legalization, her stance on prison labor, and her handling of the death penalty in certain cases.
- As a U.S. Senator from 2017 to 2021, Harris was known for supporting the Dream Act, marijuana legalization, tax and healthcare reform, and gun control.
- She also gained attention for her pointed questions during public hearings, including those with Jeff Sessions and Brett Kavanaugh.
Vice President (2021-2025): As Vice President from 2021 to 2025, Harris cast 33 tie-breaking votes in the Senate, helping to pass the American Rescue Plan and the Inflation Reduction Act. She led efforts to address the causes of Central American migration, including regional visits, anti-corruption task forces, and partnerships with the private sector.
Harris also managed foreign policy trips to Ukraine and Israel/Gaza. Her approval ratings were often low, and she faced criticism for high staff turnover.
Single-digit IQ is unfair, as she is a career prosecutor and the Congresswoman, who has done measurable advocacy work and holds great firsts as the first woman to hold the position, the first Black, and the first South Asian American Vice President. Her record, like that of other politicians, is a mixed bag, with some initiatives commendable and others rightly criticized.
2024 Presidential Campaign and Spending
After Joe Biden stepped down on July 21, 2024, Harris became the sole nominee following a virtual roll call. Her campaign and affiliated committees raised and spent about $1.15 billion, with total spending reaching around $2 billion, making it one of the most expensive presidential campaigns in U.S. history.
She raised $1 billion in three months and set a record for single-day fundraising. Over $650 million was spent on advertising during her final campaign.
Harris lost the election to Trump, receiving 226 electoral votes. She won several traditional Democratic strongholds, including California, New York, and Illinois. Contrary to some claims, she did not lose every state; the statement that she “did not win a single state” is incorrect.
Losing an election despite high spending is common in American politics. Both parties often spend hundreds of millions, or even billions, in close races. Fundraising alone does not decide the outcome. In 2024, factors like voter priorities, the economy, inflation, and immigration played important roles.
Current Status and Political Ambitions (as of April 2026)
Harris left office in January 2025. Since then, she has criticized the Trump administration and supported Democratic candidates. She has also earned income through a talent agency and media contracts. As she considers her plans for 2028, she is weighing the political climate and the state of American society.
Harris has focused on building a strong political network, connecting with people who have political ambitions and financial influence.
She is a polarizing figure in American politics, with most of her supporters on the left, who see her as a champion for marginalized groups. Her opponents are mainly on the right and disagree with her positions. Despite losing several elections, Harris remains active and influential in the Democratic Party.
-
-
Why is Kamala Harris such an idiot and incompetent? Why is it that she is so unlikeable?
-
She’s been a career politician, and Kamala Harris has had a mixed track record that leaves a lot to be desired, namely her inability to connect with the common folk, and while many disparage her as an idiot, that’s being overly dramatic.
Kamala Harris has been climbing the ranks of politics in California, where she has served as district attorney, attorney general, and senator, and then rising internationally to become the vice president of the USA. Supporters of Harris praise her for being an aggressive prosecutor, for protective and responsive laws for and against children, and for protecting consumers. In addition to her praise, Harris has been historically recognized as the first woman of African and South Asian descent to serve as a vice president. Harris is facing criticism, with a generational divide between older and younger generations, and said the criticism is aimed at the high turnover of her staff and gaps in the policies. Those described communication issues are a summation of the larger issues at hand. These patterns of public records covering polls and records from media and journalism, which span the extremes of the left and right wings of the government, are documented, verified facts that have been absent from the conversation about conspiracy theory records.
Key criticisms of Harris’s competency have focused on Border and immigration, and Staff and office management. Harris has faced documented criticism over record-high border crossings from Central America during her tenure. There were over 2.4 million crossings during that fiscal year. Harris received documented criticism for her public statements, which documented a lack of criticism of the border crossings. There had been documented criticisms of Harris’s office management staff, which led to high turnover among her staff, reported by many, including Politico, the Washington Post, and Axios. Staff turnover was reported at the level of her chief of staff, and her many communication directors were rapidly replaced. Staff critics described the office environment as dysfunctional, with high micromanagement, creating a sense of unclear direction.
- Public speaking skills and interviews: Videos show Kamala Harris responding with long, complicated statements that do not answer questions, giving scripted media portrayals, saying things like ‘the significance of the passage of the time’ and ‘We have to move on… unburdened by what has been…’ These types of interviews are not unique to Harris, but the responses lack authenticity, as confirmed by focus groups and viral clips. While interviewing supporters for the 2024 elections, many of them also suggested that a suitable answer to the question of ‘what is the main aim of the campaign, is it just to be against Trump? ‘ is not clearly articulated.
- Legislative outcome: While serving as a senator, Harris herself was involved in passing legislation that many described as being too ambitious. While serving as a Vice President, the additional child tax credits and components of the ‘Build Back Better’ legislation were not implemented, leaving many of the legislation’s supporters behind. Kamala Harris has been accused of being a ‘prosecutor’ who advocates for a tough-on-crime stance, and implicit in the stance against the early legalization of marijuana and the single advocacy shift of legalizing.
Polls indicated this: Kamala Harris’ favorability rating has been in the mid-40 % range during the 2024 elections. More negative than positive results are seen in the professional assessment reports obtained by Kamala Harris, which show that Kamala performs better than other politicians who have worked in the same profession.
Likability factors
This is largely subjective. From the media coverage to the perceived authenticity, all have an impact on Harris.
- Inflated inauthenticity: Audience frustration with numerous accent changes (which still persist today), rehearsed laughter, and no response to the ‘substance’ of the discussion has led cartoonists and comedians in various genres (including SNL and late-night) to lay out the content of their presentations.
- Increased their partisan alignment, which is, in many cases, a plus for Harris. More than 90% of Democrats who identified strongly with their party liked Harris, while Independents and Republicans did not. The early collapse of her campaign in the 2020 elections was indicative of Harris’s inability to attract even a sizable number of Democrats. The enthusiasm gap was not closed, even by the initial burst of excitement when it was anticipated that Biden’s withdrawal would leave Harris’s replacement role to the 2024 elections.
- Wider context: The current political environment favors talent for media theatrics. With less detail and more prosecution-style drama, Harris’s performance was also different from the more folksy or realistically combative candidates. In rival polls, she was also outperformed by acquaintances. Critiques, whether cultural, identity-related, or others, such as biased partisanship, generally lack substantive critique. Defenses often seem to be under attack for pointing out sexism or racism.
Somewhat fair critique
Since she isn’t the only recent VP nominee to perform poorly, the public and the political field have mostly accepted verbal gaffes or a lack of substantive performance (e.g., Biden, Quayle, and Palin). Good things about Harris include: her backward-bending support for certain voters, her legal expertise on reproductive rights and abortion post-Dobbs (decision), and her ability to handle (or tough it out) in trying situations (e.g., during her confirmation hearings). California AG post has some wins in public-interest areas, i.e., the environment, and a few dollars’ worth of (modern) settlements. Average measurable outputs of her governance- such as (high) rates of staff turnover, border statistics, (low) rates of public approval for her governance, and poor performance of (or low) rates of her campaign- gave enough fodder (or) resources to opponents for labeling her as incompetent. Essentially, the likability gap frequently arises due to (or as) disappointment in voters perceived as disingenuous.
To the so-called ‘idiot’ and to personal attacks based on hyperbole, there is, in fact, a lot of data that (i.e., policy outcomes, internal staff accounts, and election results showing a loss of popular votes in 2024, etc.). Successful critiques focus on facts, unlike comments on the data and empty insults that help political opponents establish their (similar) flawed candidates. Finally, it is the voters who dictate.
-
Cannot believe former Attorney General Pam Bondi and Eric Swalwell were close friends where Bondi tipped him off with classified information about himself. Traitor and treasonous acts that need to get investigated and charged.
Log in to reply.