-
Working For Two Mortgage Companies At The Same Time
-
NEXA Lending and Coast to Coast Mortgage Lending (C2C) both start from the same 275-basis-point yield spread paid by the wholesale lender to the brokerage company, but their approaches to splitting or deducting that compensation create meaningfully different outcomes for an independent mortgage loan officer or net branch.
Under NEXA, the company applies a two-part deduction from the full 275 basis points:
- NEXA first takes 25 basis points only on the first three million dollars of any loan amount and waives that portion entirely on any dollars above three million, which effectively reduces the company’s percentage take on larger loans.
- It then applies a flat additional 30-basis-point deduction across the entire loan.
- For any loan of three million dollars or less, these combined deductions leave the loan officer with a clean net of 220 basis points.
- On loans larger than three million dollars the waived 25-basis-point layer on the excess amount pushes the net compensation upward, approaching but never quite reaching 245 basis points as the loan grows very large.
- If the loan officer is classified as a 1099 independent contractor, NEXA pays the full net basis points directly.
- If the officer is structured as W2, NEXA withholds an extra 10 percent of that net amount for employer tax matching, so the officer receives only 90 percent of the already-calculated 220-basis-point (or tier-adjusted) figure.
- In either employment status the independent loan officer remains responsible for paying all of their own marketing, licensing, office, and other business expenses out of pocket.
C2C, by comparison, passes the entire 275-basis-point spread straight through to the independent mortgage loan officer or net branch with no percentage split at all.
- Instead, the company simply deducts a flat per-file fee from the officer’s gross compensation on every closed loan.
- That fee begins at $995 per file when the branch or team closes six or fewer loans in a month.
- It drops to $795 per file once seven or more loans are closed in the month, and it falls further to $595 per file when monthly volume exceeds ten loans.
- Because the deduction is a fixed dollar amount rather than a percentage, its impact shrinks rapidly as loan sizes increase and as monthly production volume rises.
- Like NEXA’s 1099 option, the C2C independent loan officer or net branch pays all of their own expenses, but the structure gives the officer access to the full 275-basis-point gross before the flat fee is subtracted.
Case Scenario Compensation Comparison
When comparing concrete case scenarios, the two models diverge sharply depending on loan size and monthly volume.
- Take a moderate-sized $500,000 loan closed by a solo 1099 loan officer who is closing only a handful of files per month.
- Under NEXA the officer receives the fixed 220 basis points, which equals $11,000 in gross compensation before expenses.
- Under C2C the same officer receives the full 275 basis points worth $13,750 minus the standard $995 per-file fee, leaving $12,755 or an effective net of roughly 255.1 basis points. In this low-volume, average-sized loan situation C2C therefore delivers noticeably higher take-home pay.
Case Scenario of $500,000 Loan
Shift the scenario to a high-production mortgage net branch closing twelve loans per month, each still sized at $500,000. NEXA’s compensation remains locked at 220 basis points or $11,000 per loan regardless of volume. With C2C the branch now qualifies for the lowest $595 per-file fee, so the officer or branch keeps $13,750 minus $595, which equals $13,155 or an effective 263.1 basis points per loan. The volume discount widens the gap dramatically, making C2C far more rewarding for productive teams.
Case Scenario of $250,000 Loan
Now consider a smaller $250,000 loan in a low-volume environment.
- NEXA still pays the fixed 220 basis points, producing $5,500 gross.
- C2C pays the full $6,875 gross spread minus the $995 fee, resulting in $5,880 or an effective 235.2 basis points.
- C2C still leads, but the flat-fee burden is heavier relative to the smaller loan size, so the advantage narrows compared with larger loans.
Case Scenario of $4 Million Loan
On the opposite end, examine a jumbo $4,000,000 loan.
- Because this amount exceeds NEXA’s three-million-dollar threshold, the waived 25-basis-point layer on the excess one million dollars lifts the net above the standard 220 basis points to 226.25 basis points, or $90,500 gross.
- With C2C—even at the highest $995 fee—the deduction is only about 2.5 basis points, so the officer keeps roughly 272.5 basis points or $109,005.
- The flat-fee model therefore creates a substantial edge on very large loans where the percentage spread dwarfs the fixed cost.
W2 Income vs 1099 Compensation Case Scenario
Finally, factor in NEXA’s W2 option on that same $500,000 loan. The 10 percent employer-tax withholding reduces the already-calculated $11,000 gross to $9,900 net to the employee. This is the lowest payout among all the scenarios examined, though the W2 route might carry other non-compensation benefits such as payroll tax handling or company-provided resources that are not detailed here. Across the board, NEXA delivers more predictable, strictly percentage-based earnings that remain steady for typical loan sizes but improve modestly on jumbo loans, while C2C’s full-spread-plus-flat-fee structure rewards higher loan amounts and higher monthly volume and generally produces higher net compensation once the per-file fee is covered. The better choice hinges on whether an officer expects mostly moderate loans and lower volume (where the gap is modest) or larger loans and stronger production (where C2C pulls clearly ahead), as well as on the preference for 1099 versus W2 tax and expense treatment.
-
I heard Edge Home Finance, a national mortgage broker licensed in multiple states has been sold. Edge Home Finance is not a direct lender nor a mortgage broker. They had an aggressive recruitment campaign recruiting producing mortgage loan originators become independent mortgage loan originators or MLOs interested in having their own P and L. Many mom and pop independent mortgage brokers surrendered their NMLS mortgage broker company license in multiple states and joined Edge Home Finance on the promise they can operate as their own DBA with their own P and L and still operate their own mortgage broker company with full independence. Now, those folks are shit out of luck and now need to go back and re-open their own P and L NMLS mortgage broker since Edge Home Finance is not longer in business and has been sold. Many similar NMLS licensed mortgage brokers such as EDGE HOME FINANCE are offering full independence by surrendering your current brick and mortar mom and pop mortgage broker and join their larger mortgage broker and save hassles, such as licensing, bonding, corporate infrastructure, accounting, insurance, payroll, P and L, compliance, and operate under your own DBA and handle your own P and L for a fee, which can be basis points per file or a flat fee per closed loan. Some of similar mortgage brokers like Edge Home Finance are the following:
1. NEXA Lending.
2. LOAN FACTORY
3. BARRETT FINANCIAL GROUP
4. C2 FINANCIAL
5. SEA TO SEA MORTGAGE LENDING (C2C Mortgage Lending).
Can you please name other mortgage brokers with similar business models and operations platforms like Edge Home Finance? Heard there were rumors that Nexa Lending is for sale also and the CEO, Mike Kortas, sent out several memos via the internet and social media platforms that is was a blatant lie. Can you please also cover each of these mortgage broker operations and compensation systems and models and if it misleading to give up your own mom and pop mortgage broker and join one of these mortgage brokers as a mortgage net branch?
-
Mortgage Broker Compensation Models and Flat-Fee Structures? Should I open my own mortgage broker company or should I become a net mortgage branch of NEXA Lending, Barrett Financial, Loan Factory, C2 Financial, UMortgage, or C2C Mortgage Lending. Which is better and the best compensation?
-
This reply was modified 2 weeks, 5 days ago by
Sapna Sharma.
-
This reply was modified 2 weeks, 5 days ago by
-
The best compensation is usually not “which brand pays the most on paper.” It is which model leaves you with the highest net income after fees, payroll structure, pricing competitiveness, support costs, licensing overhead, compliance burden, and lead flow. Based on publicly available information, Loan Factory is the clearest flat-fee model, NEXA is the clearest high-bps/high-independence net-branch style model, and C2 appears stronger on platform breadth and channel flexibility than on publicly posted comp specifics. UMortgage, Barrett Financial, and Coast2Coast/C2C may still be good fits, but from what I found, their public pages are much less transparent on exact comp than Loan Factory or NEXA.
Here Is The Blunt Answer:
If you already produce consistently, want full control, and can handle compliance and operations, opening your own mortgage broker company usually wins long term. You keep the economics, control your comp plan, own the brand, own the recruits, and are not exposed to a parent company changing terms or strategy. But you also take on licensing, state maintenance, insurance, payroll, accounting, QC, compliance, audits, vendor contracts, and management risk.
If you want to maximize take-home pay without building full infrastructure yet, a true flat-fee or very high-split platform is usually better than a traditional branch split. That is why Loan Factory and NEXA stand out in the public info. Loan Factory says its 1099 model pays 100% commission with a $595 flat admin fee plus $500 processing fee per closed loan, and says it charges no monthly software fees. NEXA publicly promotes 220–275 bps and also publicized a NEXA100 structure where LOs can keep up to 100% of commission splits under stated conditions.
That means the real question is this:
Open your own broker shop vs. join a net branch
Open your own mortgage broker company is better when:
You already have stable self-generated volume, maybe 3 to 5+ funded loans a month, or a small team that can move with you. At that point, giving away branch override, corporate margin, and recruit economics often costs more than running your own company.
You also avoid the risk of a parent platform changing comp, support, or pricing later. The tradeoff is that you must build real infrastructure and be willing to be the one responsible when compliance, payroll, E&O, audits, licensing, and post-closing issues hit.
CFPB loan originator compensation rules also still apply, so you need compliant comp design from day one.
A net branch or large broker platform is better when:
You want speed to market, easier state expansion, plug-and-play LOS/POS/CRM, payroll handling, compliance support, recruiting help, and lender approvals already in place.
This is usually smartest for an LO or team that wants independence without building the whole back office yet.
It is also safer if your production is inconsistent, because opening your own company creates fixed expenses whether or not you close loans.
Which compensation model is usually best
Best pure economics for many self-sourced producers: flat-fee
A flat-fee model is often best if your average loan size is solid and you self-source most of your business. Why? Because on a large loan, a flat fee hurts less than a 10%, 20%, or 30% split. Loan Factory’s public structure is the easiest example: 100% commission, then fixed per-file fees. On a $500,000 loan with 100 bps gross comp, you generate $5,000. After $595 admin and $500 processing, you net about $3,905 before taxes and your own overhead.
Best for high producers who want recruiting upside: high-bps / net-branch style
NEXA’s publicly advertised 220–275 bps and NEXA100 messaging are aimed at producers who want very high comp and branch-style independence. That can beat flat-fee economics in the right setup, especially if you control pricing well, recruit, and close enough volume to satisfy plan terms. But you need to model it carefully because “high bps” does not automatically mean best borrower pricing or best net profitability. Sometimes the highest comp plan makes your rates less competitive.
Best for balanced support and broad lender access: platform model
C2 publicly emphasizes roughly 100 wholesale lenders, a broker channel plus a mini-correspondent channel, support specialists, Slack/community support, and that it does not “pad or splice” pricing. That is attractive if you want optionality and maturity of platform, even though I did not find exact comp numbers posted on the pages I checked.
My take on the companies you named
Loan Factory
Best fit if your main priority is transparent flat-fee economics and you want to keep most of your revenue. Their public page says 1099 LOs get 100% commission, with $595 admin and $500 processing per file, plus free tech and no monthly software fees. That is excellent for experienced self-generators and teams that do not want desk-fee nonsense. Weak point: you need to judge whether the support, lender mix, and brand fit your style.
NEXA
Best fit if you want maximum independence, high bps, fast pay, and big-broker scale. NEXA’s public recruiting pages say 220–275 bps, daily payroll turnaround, and support, while outside coverage reported the NEXA100 plan offering up to 100% of commission splits without per-file fees under the stated plan. That is strong on paper. The main caution is that very aggressive comp models need very careful testing against real rate sheets, support responsiveness, and branch politics.
C2 Financial
Best fit if you want a large, established broker platform with both broker and mini-correspondent options, broad lender access, and mature support/community. C2 says it has about 100 wholesale lenders, offers 1099 in most states but W-2 in some, and passes along preferred pricing without padding/splicing. I did not find exact public comp numbers in the pages reviewed, so I would not assume it beats NEXA or Loan Factory on take-home pay without seeing an actual comp sheet.
UMortgage
Public recruiting info I found highlighted weekly pay cycle and referral bonus language, but I did not find a clear public comp schedule in the pages surfaced. That does not mean the comp is bad. It means you should demand a written branch economics sheet before making any decision.
Barrett Financial
I found Barrett careers pages and consumer pages, but I did not find a clean public comp page with branch economics. Same conclusion: possible good platform, but not transparent enough publicly for me to call it “best compensation.”
C2C Mortgage Lending / Coast2Coast Mortgage
I found the company site, but not a usable public breakdown of LO or branch compensation. I would put this in the “only evaluate if they give you a written P&L and fee sheet” bucket.
What is “better” in practice
For most experienced producers, the ranking usually looks like this:
Best long-term wealth:
Open your own broker company.
Best short-to-medium-term net income without building infrastructure:
A flat-fee model like Loan Factory, or a very high-split platform like NEXA, depending on your volume and pricing sensitivity.
Best if you want stability, broad lender access, support, and less operational headache:
C2, and possibly Mortgage or Barrett if their private offer is strong enough.My direct recommendation
My honest recommendation:
Open your own mortgage broker company if all 4 are true:
You already have repeat referral partners or self-generated business, you close enough volume to cover fixed overhead comfortably, you want to recruit under your own brand, and you are willing to own compliance and operations.
Join a high-independence platform instead if even 1 of these is false.
And if you join a platform, based on public information alone:
For pure comp transparency: Loan Factory
For aggressive high-split independence: NEXA
For broader institutional platform feel: C2The one mistake not to make
Do not choose based on headline bps alone. Because mortgage broker compensation is constrained by CFPB loan originator compensation and anti-steering rules, your comp plan has to work inside a compliant structure, and a higher comp plan can still lose if borrower pricing gets worse, support is weak, or corporate fees show up elsewhere.
What you should compare before signing anywhere
Get each company to give you these in writing:
- Gross comp plan, branch override, admin/per-file fees, processing fees, payroll taxes treatment, tech fees, compliance fees, E&O, state license help, who owns recruits, who owns the database, exit restrictions, non-solicit terms, lender count, pricing markup policy, and what happens if the company is sold or restructures.
My bottom line:
If you want the safest, smartest long-term move and you have real production, open your own mortgage broker company.
If you want the best current plug-and-play comp, start by modeling Loan Factory and NEXA side by side.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5FNwE1kitA
-
This reply was modified 2 weeks, 5 days ago by Winston.
-
This reply was modified 2 weeks, 5 days ago by Sapna Sharma.
Log in to reply.